Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Schratter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sole Keep fails to make a clear argument based on WP:PAG while the OP and supporting pro-Delete commentor do. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:38, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Schratter

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains^(talk) 01:09, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 05:14, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Doable, but the way the article is currently written is unencyclopedic. Hazax (talk) 23:16, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Enigma^msg 04:36, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:04, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NMODEL and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:14, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.