Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K C Mittal (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

K C Mittal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources provided could not establish notability of the subject. Apart from this [1], I was not able to find anything on doing WP:Before. This one also does not give enough WP:SIGCOV. Fails GNG. I would also like to show a suspicious activity [2] here. User Speedy King is permanently blocked and most of his/her articles have been deleted. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 03:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 03:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 03:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 03:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 03:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it was previously discussed at AfD and the result was no consensus. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Previous discussions: 2020-12 no consensus

Logs: 2020-11 ✍️ create

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste_{charge-parity}^time 08:41, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 08:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails GNG. --RaviC (talk) 12:04, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.