Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kadrolsha Ona Carole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kadrolsha Ona Carole

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person is known for researching paranormal activity, being a "talking head" on some DVD coverage and minor TV shows, and not a lot else. A search for sources brings back up a couple of Huffington Post pieces, one or two local news items, and that's it. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable paranormal researcher and minor actor lacking in-depth, non-trivial, WP:SECONDARY support. A google search fails to show any support that would help this article meet Wikipedia standards for inclusion. "References" are single line listings, press releases, and articles that fail to mention subject. Is an advertisement for the subject and fails WP:N. reddogsix (talk) 19:37, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:11, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I should note that the Huffington Post pieces are not from the "real" HuffPo, but are instead from the "Huffington Post Contributor Platform", over which HuffPo exercises minimal editorial control and so are not WP:RS. That type of article is the closest this subject gets to GNG notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Of interest may be this, sourced to IMDB and the same Huffington sources. —Paleo Neonate – 21:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I have tried to find more references in reliable sources like newspapers but failed. Cameo appearences also don't count, even in the filmography of notable actors. The movie(s) also appear rather underground. I know of the Toxic Avenger, but never heard of Toxic Tutu before. It's possible that future events may increase notability and that it's simply WP:TOOSOON... —Paleo Neonate – 21:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Voicing the nominator albeit i believe this article may be developed at a later time as of now it is WP:TOOSOON. Celestina007 (talk) 18:21, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.