Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendra Norman-Bellamy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 04:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kendra Norman-Bellamy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Desire to have page rebuilt with updated information including author name change. Attempts to redirect have failed. Need a fresh page. KendraB (talk) 00:15, 23 August 2016 (UTC) Creating deletion discussion for Kendra Norman-Bellamy Adding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendra Norman-Bellamy[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 August 23. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:33, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. First of all, the nominator does not appear to want this article deleted, so it probably should not have been brought to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Second, if this page is supposed to be moved, what title should it be moved to? Third, and incidentally, is the nominator User:KendraB the same person that this article is about? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:43, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment While the nom probably intended to use WP:RM, all facts suggest that this is nothing more than a poorly sourced autobiography of a non-notable writer that ought to be considered for deletion. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 11:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:57, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No matter how it landed here, sources exist to establish notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:29, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

rewrote a bit of article, sourced to a moving profile in the Atlanta Journal Constitution, her books sell, there is more coverage in mainstream sources. This is a very simple AFD about a notable writer that needs a rewrite and better sourcing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:44, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:24, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I agree with E.M.Gregory. In addition, on EBSCO there are a number of reviews of her work in RS. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:35, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.