Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Johnson (Mormon)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:09, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth Johnson (Mormon)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This non-notable subject does not meet WP:BASIC. Coverage found in searches for independent, reliable sources is limited to name checks and very minor passing mentions. The article is reliant on primary sources, which do not establish notability on Wikipedia. Per WP:BEFORE searches, significant coverage in independent, reliable sources does not appear to exist for this subject. Furthermore, per: WP:SPIP:

The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works of their own that focus upon it—without incentive, promotion, or other influence by people connected to the topic matter.

– North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:05, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:06, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:06, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:06, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:ANYBIO and is run of the mill. AmericanAir88^(talk) 17:12, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Feel free if you can make a strong, well-sourced argument for keeping, I am always willing to revisit, but my searches aren't finding notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.