- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:36, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Konok Karmakar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable "record" holder, as per WP:RSP there is no indication that a guinness record alone is enough to substantiate notability and given that there is no other coverage, this person doesn't meet our inclusion criteria. TAXIDICAE💰 12:04, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support & Delete: Per nominator's reasoning. Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 12:27, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:10, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:10, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Google search only found the Guinness World Records and nothing else of note. Fails WP: GNG. ColinBear (talk) 22:35, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete 'Record number of records'? That's more or less the records equivalent of 'famous for being famous'. (Quality ones, too, like 'Longest duration balancing a guitar on the forehead'.) [Woe]fully non-notable. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:52, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.