- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus GNG not met Nosebagbear (talk) 11:43, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Logan T. Kurtz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to meet GNG, briefly received a small amount of coverage in 2010 but not enough to justify an article Greyjoy talk 09:29, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Greyjoy talk 09:29, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. Greyjoy talk 09:29, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:04, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per GNG fail. Apples&Manzanas (talk) 16:03, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Oaktree b (talk) 20:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete totally fails GNG which is the minimum standard for all articles. Any article that fails to meet GNG should be deleted.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.