Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manami Yoshii

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Manami Yoshii

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, interviews, passing mentions, industry PR materials, commercial websites, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:NACTOR. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:15, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 06:13, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 06:13, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 06:14, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 06:14, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable porn actress, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 16:28, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet our insanely over braod notability guidelines for pornographic actresses. Do not get me started on how many more articles we have on Japanese ponographic actresses than Japanese women poets, the discrepency is sickening.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I actually meant to cite Category:Japanese women judges, which has 3 to the pornographic film actresses 112. The Japanese women poets category has 80 entries, not quite as out of line, but still less than the pornographic film actresses, and still a point of gripes for years.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:58, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.