Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massimo De Feo (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:48, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Massimo De Feo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subject that continues to not meet WP:BASIC. Coverage found in searches for independent, reliable sources consists of minor quotations from the subject, short passing mentions and name checks. The article is reliant upon primary sources, which do not qualify notability.

The Mormons in the Piazza: History of The Latter-day Saints in Italy source in the article, which lists page 505, is not able to be previewed. Regardless, even if the entire page is only about the subject, that's still only one source. Multiple sources that provide significant coverage are required to establish notability, not just one. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:43, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I have to admit I am worn out by this constant nominating of articles I have spent so much time and energy on developing. I really expected to see more coverage of Feo, with the dedication of the Rome Italy Temple and with him being in the delegation lead by President Nelson that met with Pope Francis. However all we seem to have gotten is a captioned photo. So I just give up.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam. --151.54.243.13 (talk) 08:41, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.