Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael M. Berger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Michael M. Berger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was a contested A7 over a month ago. Still no improvement. An accomplished attorney, however, other than WP:ROUTINE coverage, there is no in-depth coverage sufficient to show he passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:20, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 10:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: If not sufficiently notable, should be redirected to Brigham–Kanner Property Rights Prize. That said, [1], [2], [3] and [4] suggests that a WP:HEY save might be possible. In fact, he might get across the mark on cited writings. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 11:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane ^talk 10:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - he appears to pass my standards for lawyers. Bearian (talk) 00:32, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.