Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P4R4G0N (hacktivist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Delete. by Bbb23 per G5. (non-admin closure) —SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 17:33, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P4R4G0N (hacktivist)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Unsourced statements and not a shred of actual notability. Sounds like a scriptkiddie bragging. Kleuske (talk) 09:00, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This has already been denied of deletion through PROD. I heard of this hacker in IRC that's why it's created. Thus I can't find any major source on him. --IAWI (talk) 09:12, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @IAWI: Correction: you created the article and removed the prod. AfD is the obvious next step. The fact that you heard of this person is not a reason to create an article. We're an encyclopedia, not facebook. Kleuske (talk) 10:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. IAWI (talk) 09:13, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable individual. Insufficient (read: none whatsoever) coverage in reliable news sources or the literature. Fails to meet the minimum persistent and in-depth coverage required to pass WP:BASIC. Just like the article's creator, I too "can't find any major source on him" :) —SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 12:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable individual. If it had one source it would have been A7 and deleted long ago. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Someone ;) would have just come along and said "Claiming to hack NASA" = a WP:CCS, and we'd still be here... —SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 13:42, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete per no sense of notability metQuek157 (talk) 13:55, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.