Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pantho Rahaman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:29, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pantho Rahaman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Winner of National ICT Award is not something that would be expected to have an article on English Wikipedia unless they meet relevant notability guidelines WP:JOURNALIST. Search doesn't produce any coverage and substantial information in the independent RS about the person either so fails to meet basic GNG.. Saqib (talk) 13:20, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

National Information and Communication Technology Awards an National award given by the Bangladesh government! And he is the winner of this award. NC Hasive • talk • 13:29, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The award itself is of dubious notability. --Saqib (talk) 13:03, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 15:02, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 15:02, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 15:02, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Enigma^msg 04:44, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Qualifies as WP:ANYBIO#1. Per WP:SIGCOV, coverage does not have to be in English to qualify as demonstrating notability and the sources for the award are in some of the largest media sources for Bangladesh. Articles in the subject article also demonstrate compliance with WP:GNG, demonstrating significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. ~!Eggishorn (talk) (contrib)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.