Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paula von Hentke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 23:32, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paula von Hentke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:No original research. Article is built almost entirely from primary sources like concert programs and theater performance databases. There are no independent secondary sources which address the subject directly and in detail. While I don't doubt that the subject could arguably meet WP:NMUSICIAN based on primary sources, the overuse of primary materials is problematic for its WP:OR. This is an example of someone who needs some coverage in secondary sources in order to be compliant with policies outside WP:N. We fundamentally can't build an article mainly off of primary materials. This is an example of where an academic needs to do some work first and get published in a journal or write something up in a book before we can have an article. 4meter4 (talk) 23:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.