Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preeti Chandrakant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per WP:TNT. Thanks everyone for your participation and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 16:22, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Preeti Chandrakant

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pure puffery, Notabililty aside WP:TNT applies here. Fails GNG, doesn't qualify parameters of persistent, significant and in depth coverage Accesscrawl (talk) 13:48, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Accesscrawl (talk) 13:48, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Accesscrawl (talk) 13:48, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Accesscrawl (talk) 13:48, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Accesscrawl (talk) 13:48, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Accesscrawl (talk) 13:48, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Accesscrawl (talk) 13:48, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete per WP:TNT. I read the entire article twice, without skipping a line. Every section is verrry verrry interesting. I wonder why the great wise seer and knower couldnt see her own article getting nuked. —usernamekiran (talk) 05:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT; it's full up with promotional waffle and copyvio material, and if there's a case for notability somewhere in there, the text would have to be completely rewritten anyway. XOR'easter (talk) 19:32, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.