Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosalie Ward

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rosalie Ward (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actor. WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of substantial coverage. Almost all of the subjects roles have been minor or even uncredited. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete could not find much at all on Google and does not have any major roles in films and generally one-episode performances in Tv. Apart from Saints and Sinners where she has a supporting role in 8 out of 60 episodes but not enough for WP:NACTOR imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:51, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This article has existed since July 2008 and yet the only source is IMDb. That is not a reliable source and Wikipedia is not supposed to be an IMDb mirror. There is no reason to have an article that has no other sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. (Not to be confused with the photographer) I have to agree with the above. No SIGCOV could be found about this individual in print or online, nor do they meet any other relevant criteria. PK650 (talk) 04:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.