- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JGHowes talk 03:56, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sacha Nemcov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
What a mess. Appears to have been moved from AfC by 2 (now) blocked editors. Absolutely non-notable. 3 bad sources available, a blog interview discussing cryptocurrency, a newspaper article discussing local pot laws that mentions him in passing, and another blog post that mentions him in passing once. Therefore fails GNG by not having any real coverage in reliable, independent sources. PK650 (talk) 21:15, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. PK650 (talk) 21:15, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. SharabSalam (talk) 21:20, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:35, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete When an article starts by touting someones "academic credentials" and those are from a for proffit institution, this is pretty much a sure sign that it is overly promotional.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:57, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Some minor coverage, interviewed as blogs, profile pages. Logs of blog entries. Mercury news. Nothing else that I can see. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 10:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.