Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Purpuro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consunsus was the article has been sufficently improved (non-admin closure) N0nsensical.system^(err0r?)_(.log) 09:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra Purpuro

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ENT. No actual references and three external links to movie databases. CatcherStorm ^talk 08:24, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CatcherStorm ^talk 08:24, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CatcherStorm ^talk 08:24, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:03, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:03, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak~~ Keep: It's a shame that an actress with so many credits and recurring roles would struggle to meet notability standards—however, I do believe that to be the case here. But, I think that, with some work, the article could be considered borderline and allowed to remain. She is mentioned in some sources online, and there are currently none contained within the article. Dflaw4 (talk) 15:05, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Given the work that has been done on the article since the nomination, I am upgrading my vote to "Keep", as per WP:HEY. Dflaw4 (talk) 06:45, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete we should only have articles on people who are clearly notable. To show such we need to find sources beyond routine, directory listings.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:34, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per WP:HEY as the article now has 13 references while at the start of the AfD it had none. Sources including the New York Times and Chicago Tribune and book sources show that the subject had a notable theatre career as well as film and tv. With these improvements deletion is no longer necessary, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 16:03, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.