Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah J. Halstead

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GirthSummit _(blether) 12:02, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah J. Halstead

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Supported entirely with unreliable/primary/non-independent sources. WP:BEFORE did not yield anything better. Fails WP:GNG, fails WP:ENT. Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:59, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a poorly sourced and written vanity article which checks all the boxes for UPE. Not a single reliable secondary independent on the article. BEFORE shows nothing better. Three or four of the sources are reprints of the exact same press release. John from Idegon (talk) 11:55, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:00, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:00, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:00, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not even close to being a notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't think either WP:GNG or WP:ENT is made out. Dflaw4 (talk) 13:23, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I created the page, and apologize for the fact that it is not as well-sourced as I wanted it to be. After enjoying Sarah's stand-up special, and realizing that she has a significant following on social media, I thought she met the WP:ENT for having a following. PickleG13 (talk) 04:58, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.