Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirin Kanchwala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:34, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shirin Kanchwala

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article fails WP:GNG and as per WP:NACTOR she doesn’t scale through as well. Celestina007 (talk) 16:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have found more sources and added additional verifiable information. I live in Chennai, India and she is one of the upcoming actresses with high fan followers. I believe this article satisfies both WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. warlordlaw —Preceding undated comment added 16:57, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:39, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Played the lead in a major film. As usual it is the Deccan Chronicle and the Times of India that reports early new stars in Bollywood films. Some decent coverage, all to do with early career, but I think sufficient for WP:THREE. scope_creep^Talk 16:07, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has at least three prominent roles in notable films and tv series backed up by multiple reliable sources coverage as detailed above and therefore passes WP:NACTOR so deletion is not needed in this case, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:23, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.