Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shreedeep Rayamajhi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:10, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shreedeep Rayamajhi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

clearly doesn't fulfill the WP:N criteria...sources are from some blogs and just because he wrote for the Huffington Post or was assaulted doesn't mean the subject qualifies to have a Wiki page. There are no extensive coverage on him... Ozar77 (talk) 04:02, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Ozar77 (talk) 04:02, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:06, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:06, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:06, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The ref-bombing is a red flag. The principal contributor's username is "RayShree" and they've blanked their user and talk pages after receiving a COI warning. I've tried to cut the crap but someone with a better sense of RS and relevance to notability is required here. I will remove the primary, social media and self-published sources to aid. Usedtobecool ^✉️ ✨ 20:24, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rollidan (talk) 16:54, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Pretty clearly self-promoting and I think WP:BLP1E applies. Mccapra (talk) 04:04, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 95% sure that sources that I've left in do not meet the qualifications to establish this subject's notability. Was holding out in hopes that someone else might look at it thoroughly and clean it up further. Add that with BLP1E concerns in the comment above, and I have to agree notability isn't sufficiently established to discount the self-promotional aspect of the article. I would expect an activist that ruffles feathers particularly in the current climate of attacks on freedom of speech to get decent coverage in national newspapers, which is sorely lacking here. So, I must conclude the subject maybe notable in certain sections of the blogosphere at best, if that. Usedtobecool ^✉️ ✨ 07:25, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.