Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Grasse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost (talk) 09:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Steven Grasse

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Steven Grasse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Lacks WP:SIGCOV. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens (talk) 03:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 03:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 03:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 03:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

• Keep Inquirer and Men's journal have in depth Coverage. Meets WP:GNG.Expertwikiguy (talk) 04:52, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Additional comment: Also note that he is an author and 2 of his books have their own Wiki page, with enough coverage. He also may meet WP:AUTHOR. Expertwikiguy (talk) 04:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

• Keep. Meets the WP:GNG, if nothing else. gidonb (talk) 07:06, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
• Keep on the basis of WP:AUTHOR criterion 3. But the article does have significant problems; it's written like a WP:RESUME. I'm going to add some cleanup tags. FalconK (talk) 05:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.