The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:51, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tanay Pant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, sources are not reliable or not independent. Prodded, prod removed by Mark Tuco without improvement. Huon (talk) 07:36, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 08:32, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 08:32, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Huon (talk) what kind of sources need to be added to this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.44.2.17 (talkcontribs) 13:38, September 28, 2017 (UTC)
I have removed the tabloid jounalism article statements and the info which can be confirmed remains now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.44.2.17 (talkcontribs) 11:48, September 29, 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.