Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tess Taylor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:05, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tess Taylor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Does not meet WP:NMODEL and significant RS coverage not found. Cyber Girl of the Year honour is not significant and well known; the article on the program has been deleted here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playboy Cyber Club (2nd nomination). Does not meet WP:NACTOR either as the roles are all minor. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:51, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 03:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 03:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 03:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 03:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: to have a character based on her in a Sofia Coppolla film seems notable enough. PamD 10:46, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have no opinion on this AfD, but re: this "keep" vote. A character based on her is only there insomuch that one of the real life members of the "Bling Ring" thieves is this subject's sister, Alexis Neiers, and the film simply chose to fictionalize one of it's essential characters as having a sister who was also involved but didn't get caught. I don't find this any more notable than any other tangential character based on a real life counterpart, e.g. if a character based on a real person is shown in scenes with their high school principal, that doesn't automatically make the person's real life high school principal notable. Also, the source for this, Yahoo Entertainment, is of dubious significance. ShelbyMarion (talk) 16:45, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Notability is not inherited from a notable movie. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep After declaring I have no opinion in the comment above, I googled just enough to form an opinion! The subject was a principal on a short-lived reality program but did receive tabloid-level attention for tangential real-life problems. While I personally wouldn't consider this subject to be of encyclopedic importance, sources--however frivolous--do exist. ShelbyMarion (talk) 16:54, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The coverage in tabloids for tangential real-life problems is not "significant RS coverage" as required per BLP. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable porn actress, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 17:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete not notable. Tabloid interest is the definition of unencyclopaedic. Spartaz ^Humbug! 10:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.