Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiya Gandwani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Tiya Gandwani

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Tiya Gandwani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This biography of a living person is sourced only to twitter posts. Tagged for A7 in 2009, but detagged, and BLProdded by Mdaniels5757 in January this year, but deprodded by an IP, so it appears that AfD is my only option. Intriguingly, the creator's userpage appears to be an inappropriate cross-namespace redirect to this article and they're using the article talk page as their own talk page.—S Marshall T/C 14:37, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —S Marshall T/C 14:37, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:16, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:16, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• Weak delete: Fair number of supporting roles, but it doesn't seem like any significant roles. Nothing in the sources or that I could find of a review that gave more than a name-drop. Can't see how WP:NACTOR is met here. Ravensfire (talk) 17:36, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Note that the user space redirects were from the page move that created the article and never cleaned up. Ravensfire (talk) 17:37, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.