Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Morris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:22, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tyler Morris

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to quite meet WP:MUSICBIO. Long history of promotional edits from single-purpose accounts Tyler5150ful and BobKelley. Eman 235/talk 03:34, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 04:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 04:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 04:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. He may go on to become notable, but at the moment it is TOOSOON. I note (as mentioned at the Teahouse) that the first reference does not make any mention of the subject, and the other two are to his own website.--Gronk Oz (talk) 08:23, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above comment. --Comment by Selfie City (talk about my contributions) 19:14, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom. Not notable yet. Britishfinance (talk) 01:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I have no dispute with the general "too soon" consensus above, but the kid has received some robust profiles in the blues press: [1], [2], [3]. His recent album has also gotten in-depth reviews in that genre's magazines: [4], [5], [6]. The article currently reads like an attempt at personal promotion, but it can be improved with more honest content from the media coverage he has received in the past few months. However, I can find no online evidence that the recent album charted in Billboard. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:27, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 14:12, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.