Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Udeme Emmanuel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 19:45, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Udeme Emmanuel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable? PabloMartinez (talk) 16:43, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 18:46, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 18:46, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 18:46, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 18:46, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable. There's no evidence that's he actually holds an elected or even an appointed position within the government so fails WP:POLITICIAN. --Meanderingbartender (talk) 19:32, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Being vice-chairman of a local government area is not an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL — it could get him in the door if he were reliably sourceable to enough media coverage to clear NPOL #2 ("major local political figures who have received significant press coverage"), but it is not an inclusion freebie that entitles him to have an article just because you can cite the bare minimum number of sources necessary to verify that he exists. Bearcat (talk) 16:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.