Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vadim Dale

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vadim Dale

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:BIO without substantial coverage in multiple independent sources. TM 03:44, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think there's enough appropriate sources to justify an entry (on just a very quick search on ProQuest I found over 100 entries but haven't checked how substantial they are-- it does look like a lot are simply TV guides referring to 'Outback Jack'), but it certainly reads like a personal promotional page at the moment. Assuming the page survives this challenge, if/when I have time I will try to cut it back to an appropriate entry. Cabrils (talk) 00:23, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:41, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not a well written article in my view, but a search throws up a lot of independent RS on this subject. Most are tier 2 or tier 3, but the volume is significant. It would lead me to expect that a casual reader would expect to find a WP article on this subject. Britishfinance (talk) 11:13, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.