Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Leahy (Australian Army soldier)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:33, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

William Leahy (Australian Army soldier)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SOLDIER. Lettler^hello 21:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettler^hello 21:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettler^hello 21:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Lettler^hello 21:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Interesting article, but all the references are primary sources and there's no reason to think that there's broader notability. As such, WP:BIO isn't met. Nick-D (talk) 23:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 03:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lettler^hello 13:27, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.