Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yvonne Maria Schäfer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:34, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yvonne Maria Schäfer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ENT (for her modelling and acting) and WP:CREATIVE (for her producing). The links at the bottom of page are not actually covering her. Going through her IMDB track record, I could find only one notable movie. and it doesn't seem like it was a particularly notable role. A broader WP:BEFORE shows nothing resembling sigcov. JBchrch (talk) 22:23, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding that the article was mostly written by SPAs [1][2][3][4][5][6]. JBchrch (talk) 22:43, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. JBchrch (talk) 22:23, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. JBchrch (talk) 22:23, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. JBchrch (talk) 22:23, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: although she seems to be somewhat prominent (you'd think so from the amount of photos that turn up when you google her name), it is hard to find anything of use on her. Her German article is virtually unsourced, too. Her film contributions do not meet the bar for WP:NACTOR. I think she does not WP:GNG either, unless several reliable sources were to appear. Modussiccandi (talk) 22:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, a Google News search on her exact name turns out only 1 result. Not using her exact name on Google News fails to turn up about her. Does not appear to be notable. SunDawn (talk) 07:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:37, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable, has mostly had bit parts in small productions that wouldn't be notable either. A long career doing nothing of note. Oaktree b (talk) 14:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A rather promotionally worded article ("successfully" doing this, "passionate" about that, etc.) but my searches are finding nothing to suggest that the subject meets the WP:CREATIVE criteria. Her appearance in some celeb culture photo-features may suggest a fallback to WP:GNG but I don't see enough to credibly say that is met either. AllyD (talk) 14:16, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.