Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zainuddin Makhdoom II

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. We're going to keep this for now – there are probably Arabic sources. If someone can try to improve the article using those sources, that would be great. Feel free to re-nominate in the future if there are concerns and the article isn't able to be improved. Missvain (talk) 16:22, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zainuddin Makhdoom II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non Notable Person, Failed WP:GNG WP:NAUTHOR Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  11:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  11:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  11:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  11:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  11:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes many books, Tuhfat Ul Mujahideen is famous one. Authordom (talk) 08:21, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The genealogy chart I linked above in Monsoon Islam page 112 (showing his grandfather as Makhdum) and the quote from page 113 n. 48, "He is often referred to locally as 'Makhdum II'." removes all doubt for me. 24.151.50.175 (talk) 22:45, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
thank you for the explanation :) —usernamekiran (talk) 10:08, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Currently there is an unsupported Keep !vote, and one other participating editor hasn't yet chosen their position, so the discussion remains non-clearly decided
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 13:51, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.