Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/Huge mistake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. There is consensus to delete, and a policy-based rationale to delete. There are 42 transclusions of this template on various user pages. There is no requirement to notify all 42 transcluders. Besides, anyone that transcludes this template would have seen a big MfD template on their userpage next to this userbox for the last 2 weeks, because that MfD template was included in the transclusion. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 21:31, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:UBX/Huge mistake

WP:UBCR does not allow propaganda, advocacy, or opinion pieces on politics. WP:POLEMIC does not allow inflammatory content in userspace. WP:BLP does not allow derogatory content on living persons in any namespace. The previous deletion was closed as speedy keep as it was filed in the wrong location. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the G R A T U I T O U S - S I Z E of the userbox for the primary purpose of promoting a viewpoint counts as disruptive in my book. Dronebogus (talk) 22:13, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and Dronebogus. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 22:39, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Intentionally polemic and divisive, judging on size. Curbon7 (talk) 02:04, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It has many current tranclusions. All active transcluders should be notified. SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - We allow latitude for some political opinions on Wikipedia userspace. This comes across as ragpicking.--🌈WaltCip-(talk) 12:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Again a perfectly valid political opinion. It is okay to believe that someone's election is/was a mistake, unless you're advocating for their unlawful termination through violence, disputing election, etc. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 12:41, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I have never liked this over flated userbox. Catfurball (talk) 17:46, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep as no more divisive than a lot of userboxes that are kept, and to allow the transcluders to defend it. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:29, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note to Closer - If you think that there may be a consensus to delete, please consider Relisting to allow the nominator to notify the transcluders. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:36, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: If you click on the template you will see that we already have other user-boxes which convey the same message. My issue is the template's size and the un-necessary huge bold wording. We don't need it as a distraction when there are alternatives. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:49, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.