Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter/Newsroom/Issue2-2


Issue 2 (02/16/2008)

Publication deadline: 12 PM Pacific-3 PM Eastern on February 16.

Please sign up for what you want to write. Have it done by the publication deadline.

Introduction

Editor:

Feature 1

Editor: Mitchazenia

Feature 2

Editor: Master son

Interstate 355 now an Featured Article  — master sonT - C 13:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Any way we can mention MI breaking 4.000 here? --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:33, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Feature 3

Editor:

Commons issues --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

This

Project news

Probably can be reused, just proofread.

State updates

Editor: Mitchazenia

Write the updates below. If signatures are present, remove them before adding to the newsletter.


Leaderboard

Editor: Scott5114

The leaderboard has yet another new face this month as some of the more neglected projects have gotten some new life; Michigan has had new life breathed into it by Imzadi1979 and Stratosphere, and Utah has seen some serious work by Davemeistermoab. This is partly due to a sort-of race going on in the IRC channel to see who would be the first to break the 4.000 Ω barrier. And the winner was Michigan, which shot up from position 21 last month to number one this month with a record-breaking Ω of 3.970!

Michigan's main competitor in the race to 4 was Connecticut, and as a result that project moved up from 5th place to second. New York has managed to hold onto the #3 spot. Newcomers to the board this month are the aforementioned Michigan and Utah. The established New Jersey project, which was #10 in December's recap and dropped off the following month, has returned, rising back up to the eighth position.

If you're unfamiliar with the WikiWork statistics, you can find more information about them at WP:USRD/A/WW. So ladies and gentlemen, here it comes! Your USRD Leaderboard for February 16, 2008!

Rank State   FA   A   GA B Start Stub ω Ω
1 Michigan 0 0 0 51 139 44 930 3.970
2 Connecticut 0 0 0 11 128 16 625 4.032
3 New York 0 0 9 180 209 255 2669 4.087
4 (D.C.) 0 0 0 4 7 6 70 4.118
5 (Alaska) 0 0 0 0 18 4 92 4.182
6 California 1 1 2 44 172 159 1620 4.274
7 Utah 0 0 0 6 24 25 241 4.304
8 New Jersey 1 0 3 39 93 164 1315 4.383
9 North Carolina 0 0 0 6 91 70 732 4.383
10 Oklahoma 0 0 2 23 59 102 819 4.403

States in parenthesis have no project. States listed in italics are task forces.

Here are the stats for the national projects.

Project   FA   A   GA B Start Stub ω Ω
USRD 4 4 31 533 2206 6243 41704 4.623
IH 2 1 9 88 267 219 2446 4.174
US 0 0 3 55 246 218 2245 4.301
Auto trails 0 0 0 3 26 20 213 4.347

Also, big news for USRD as a whole: at press time, USRD is only seven classes away from matching Wikipedia's Ω of 4.622! Great job, everyone!

Statistics are derived from this version of the state stats table table. As always, if your favorite state isn't listed here, you can find it at Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Assessment/States. Congrats to the editors at the ten states above for their hard work! Keep it up!

Deletion debates

Compiler: Xenon54 (formerly NASCAR Fan24)
Articles for deletion
Categories for discussion
Templates for deletion

Template:Susquehanna Valley Transportaion was deleted.

Images and media for deletion

Coming and going

Compiler:
User:Edit Centric left. --Rschen7754 (T C) 01:15, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter/Newsroom/Issue2-2/Featured Member

Editor:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Support Imzadi1979. --Rschen7754 (T C) 01:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Nomination for current member

Support - Great returning editor. He's certainly deserves his turn.Mitch32contribs 21:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Support. A long overdue position for a great editor. XENON54 | talk 22:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Support Juliancolton Talk 16:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

From the editor