Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20160703/Digest

Digest

Archived discussions

GANs closing too fast – Some concerns were expressed about Good Article Nominations being completed too quickly. Consensus seemed to be that the GAN process should be quick and lightweight.
Hardcore Gaming 101 – It was generally agreed that the source should be considered reliable. Previously, it had been considered a situational source based on author.
eSports style guidelines – Good discussion about eSports issues, but no major agreement was found.
Should we treat VR units as new platforms with respect to infobox – Another discussion that didn't come to a clear consensus. Another worth further consideration.

Ongoing discussions

eSports MoS starter issues for consensus building – New discussion about eSports article guidelines.

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

I thought there wasn't any consensus on bumping Hardcore Gaming 101 to be considered reliable. GamerPro64 20:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@GamerPro64: From the discussion, I got the impression it was generally agreed on as reliable in light of the comments by Sergecross73, Mable, IDV, and Thibbs. The only one who expressed concerns was Czar, but I think Thibbs reply addressed those pretty thoroughly. And sorry I didn't see your comment earlier. I just noticed it while preparing the next digest. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 14:57, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]