User talk:PeeJay
This is PeeJay's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32Auto-archiving period: 21 days |
Adding past players
I played for senrab back in the late 60-70s and went on to play professionally both asa player and coach. How can I get my name on the list of past players. Jimmy Tindell would confirm? Tony Paris (talk) 13:12, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- Are you notable enough to be considered for your own Wikipedia page? If not, you won’t be able to be listed. Who did you play professionally for? – PeeJay 13:13, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
3RR block
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Daniel Case (talk) 20:01, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Infoboxes, again
Look - I said I would not change infoboxes that are established, you said you would do the same. So on Notman, why are you changing it? Given your recent block for 3RR, I seriously suggest you stop this method of editing. GiantSnowman 11:16, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- What I agreed to was that I would not change the infobox unless it was part of a wider edit. But you also agreed not to change it unnecessarily, and your revert was definitely unnecessary. This one's on you. – PeeJay 17:09, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- But your edit at Notman was not part of a wider edit? And in any event there is no justification for changing the infobox. I don't go around changing your infobox formatting (see e.g. Phil Marsh article I recently edited), so I am unsure why you feel the need to do so when you edit? GiantSnowman 12:09, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- The Notman edit may not have been much wider, but it was wider. Go back and check. As to why, I just think it looks better. I really don’t see why you felt it was appropriate to revert. – PeeJay 12:11, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- But your edit at Notman was not part of a wider edit? And in any event there is no justification for changing the infobox. I don't go around changing your infobox formatting (see e.g. Phil Marsh article I recently edited), so I am unsure why you feel the need to do so when you edit? GiantSnowman 12:09, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
About FIFA World Cup navbox
Okay, you think that the FIFA World Cup navbox is unnecessary, then why did this UNNECESSARY navbox existed for SEVERAL YEARS until you guys nonsensically identified this is unnecessary? You said that the problem of mobile version not showing the platform should be addressed directly, but the truth is, the platform at the bottom side just do not be displayed on where they should be except the desktop pages. It would still be not displayed on mobile pages, whichever it is mobile web version or app version, until the developer change the code to the one which platforms at the bottom side of desktop pages could be able to show at all versions. If you still selfishly insist on making incovenience against users, then just go to delete the navboxes of Copa América, AFC Asian Cup, and UEFA European Championship. I don't care about which is necessary or not for YOU, what I really care is the conveniece of USERS. If the platforms at the bottom side don't show at mobile pages one day, then there is no reason for the navbox of FIFA World Cup to be deleted. Riverliu0608 (talk) 13:24, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. The study is scheduled to end on Monday, January 9, 2023. Please note this is a bit later than the initial estimate specified in the consent information sheet.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:29, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year, PeeJay!
PeeJay,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 00:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 00:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Reverting of contribution
Hi In place of simply correct my english fouls (I am Belgian French spoken), you revert (in fact you destroy) my contribution for the 2022 World Cup game's "Poland-Mexico". Why ? I use my personal notes (I had working 20 years for a national sports newspaper). And you do that without any explainaton. I don't know that you have the full and exclusive rights for Wikipedia editing. Or probably you consider to be the only expert who can do it ! Shame on you. Wikipedia without games summaries stay no more that hundred other websites: equal without interest. My English is really poor I know. But destroying or not corrcting is stupid. I will keep my ten hundrend pages of notes for myself ! Shanon11 January 5th, 2022 15h45 (Belgian time) Shanon11 (talk) 14:44, 5 January 2023 (UTC)