User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom

And there is also This archive

List of Muslim Nobel Laureates

user Skashifakram is involved in an edit war on the above article. He has violated the 3 edit rule and is not adhering to policy. Kindly review. User:Skashifakram (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Article Feedback Tool update

Hey TheRedPenOfDoom. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 16:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Also, I've created a redirect from your name-with-spaces, so that your talk page will be slightly easier to find sometimes. It looks like you've had some trouble with impersonation in the past, so you might consider registering it as a doppelganger. I don't think that the Mediawiki software would prevent someone else from starting that account (but I'm not an expert, so I might be wrong). Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 16:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Reason of Shruti Bisht.jpeg deletion.

Why u delete Shruti Bisht.jpeg file? As far as I know i was tagged "PD-self" license on this pic.... if u think my tagged license was wrong? then plz.. tell me, which license i use on non-free pics?

Chanderforyou (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.244.244.67 (talk) 09:48, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Indian Idol Junior may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:29, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Saath Nibhaana Saathiya may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Surbhi Zaveri Vyas]] as Nikki ( 2013-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:21, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pavitra Rishta may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Sushant Singh Rajput]] / [[Hiten Tejwani]] as Manav Damodar Deshmukh (

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:31, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Scandrett Regional Park may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 2Bshow.html|utmcmd%3Dreferral&__utmv=-&__utmk=62124077 Scandrett history an easy read] NZ Local]</ref> The ARC received a NZ Institute of Architects heritage award in 2007 for the conservation

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Why???

I want to knw why dis file "File:WWE_Championship.jpg" work on "PD-self" license... without any Copyright violations, widout any source, author, & permissions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.37.224.117 (talk) 12:40, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Pointless AN Notice

An IP editor has made a frivolous report regarding you at WP:AN#Vandalism. Even though the report frivolous, your entitled to a notification. Monty₈₄₅ 16:59, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

List of unusual deaths

You've made some controversial deletions from this article. If you wish others to consider these deletions, please bring them up on the article's talk page along with sources that back your claims. Rklawton (talk) 17:42, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

When the dead person isnt notable (no article) the fact that their death is reported verifies the unusual nature of the death or the death would have gone unreported. Please join the talk page discussion already open on this issue♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 18:33, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

And dont forget WP:3RR♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 22:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Qubool Hai Citations

Hi, Just wondering how you're determining whether a source is reliable? I checked the guidelines and the references from Forum32.com seem to fit especially the fact checking? I don't know if you clicked on the articles or not but forum32 is just the name of the website but it publishes articles about the show. The website is run by the production house, 4Lions, and is as reliable as you can get for an Indian tv show. Each article even has photos of the show to verify their authenticity. They even post interview videos of the cast from the set of the show. Specifically referring to revision at 18:00, 3 September 2013‎. Let me know if the articles can get added back. Thanks (Raasta123 (talk) 02:04, 7 September 2013 (UTC))

Hey thanks for the response. I had read though those articles already. Does it not matter what you are citing? I had used information in the articles to provide a citation for the location of the show or the name of the PH, not a particular viewpoint or analysis. Just wondering. (Raasta123 (talk) 15:41, 7 September 2013 (UTC))

Saath Nibhaana Saathiya

Hi there. I'm not quite sure why you keep removing the cast table from this article page. It's not there to propagate or expand any "trivia" details, it's merely there to keep a neat listing of characters and actors, as well as their durations (and any possible change of actor). I've been trying to help turn this article into something slightly more readable than it has been in the past, and your edits don't seem to have any purpose other than to rewrite everyone else's edits into your own personal style. This isn't very constructive or fair, and what's more, you're removing some vital information such as actor's names and durations. Please help to build this article rather than remove the efforts of other users such as myself. LBM | ^{TALK TO ME} 04:38, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Some fair points made - but I don't think you understand the meaning of the word "trivia". The names of certain actors and actresses are, for reasons unknown to me, not accessible. But the characters they portray are on-screen often enough to warrant credits. The fact that they are "unknown" should tell you that their names should be researched and added to the article. I disagree [b]completely[/b] with the notion that the cast table is "full of trivia", but I have readded it and omitted the details that offend you so much. Let me know. LBM | ^{TALK TO ME} 20:38, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Indeed. And while they are indeed supporting actors, they are seen very frequently on-screen, enough for the names of the actors to be credited. The fact that we don't know their names surely points to possible incompetence or ineptness on the part of the production company? LBM | ^{TALK TO ME} 20:53, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pixar Theory

As the concept of a Pixar Universe preceded the Negroni thesis by a decade, I seek your opinion about THIS. Thanks, Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 20:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps I can fold my little sourced article into the main topic Pixar and we'd have a suitable redirect target for The Pixar Theory? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 22:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Saath Nibhaana Saathiya

Hi again. I understand your willingness to help clean-up the (perhaps) poorly maintained articles of Indian television shows. I myself have contributed towards helping make the Saath Nibhaana Saathiya article somewhat more readable, although I haven't yet begun the momentous task of cleaning up the "Plot" section, which would involve either watching several episodes or collating sources for episode descriptions. It is something that I will try to help clean-up shortly.

However, I have rearranged the cast table once more. My reasoning for this is that the actors names have never been promoted by the channel. They have always been referred to as their characters. Visit the Star Plus website (only the characters are mentioned)... look at the opening credits (only the production team is referred to)... and look at the promotional programming such as the Star Parivaar Awards (the actors names are never mentioned, and they accept awards dressed as their characters). This does imply that the name of the character looms larger in the public consciousness than the name of the actor, no matter how frustrating it may be from an encyclopedic point-of-view. Therefore, the character name is the most relevant to readers/visitors of Wikipedia, and it is these names that should be credited first, not the actors.

We only know the names of some actors thanks to sources such as The Times of India or other websites referenced on the Saath Nibhaana Saathiya page. Let me know.

(By the way - what did you mean in your edit description, "third grade book report"? I don't take kindly to being insulted. I'm merely trying to make the page functional and relevant, like you, and petty insults don't help matters.)

LBM | ^{TALK TO ME} 16:50, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Saath Nibhaana Saathiya

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

LBM | ^{TALK TO ME} 17:58, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Discussion has now closed and my suggestions are on the Saath Nibhaana Saathiya talk page. Please offer advice and thoughts as per the administrators' comments. LBM | ^{TALK TO ME} 19:56, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Indian TV cleanup

Thank you for all the hard work you've been doing cleaning all the crud from Indian TV articles. I've been doing a lot of this myself over the past year or two and find that it's been a constant battle. —Psychonaut (talk) 13:07, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

White Queen OR

I think we've hit a brick wall. The only option is to call an WP:RFC, I think. 202.81.243.116 (talk) 13:15, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Sounds like a jolly good idea. I'm getting so bored waiting for it. Deb (talk) 17:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

A brick wall that follows you around. 202.81.243.116 (talk) 00:40, 17 September 2013 (UTC)