Jump to content

User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom/Archive 20

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15←Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20

I need your help

Hello TheRedPenOfDoom, Last day i proposed one article Sruthi Reddy for A7 due to no-indication on the importance to be encyclopedic on Wikipedia. The references didn't even mentions the name of article anywhere, and the IMDB of that article is created for the promotion purposes (You can see within the IMDB that i already added Official Facebook, Twitter, Instagram...etc on it). The creator removed the speedy deletion tags saying its important and all, also the creator added the articles names to some articles for making it non-orphan. I tried some times for preventing this from editing. After defeating this another user born to start removing speedy-deletion and their are commenting that the article is significant. Within the article's talk page you can find that [1] where requesting for from where the creator got these informations, but the user is not responding to that and the user removed those talks from the page. Also I talked with the Wikipedian who removed the article, later that user removed all that talk from his page. I think its an execution of some users in a periodic time to made encyclopedic of that article. The article have been created earlier by an user on Shruti reddy (which is deleted last time due to these promotive contents), also Shruti_Reddy (which is deleted last time for about three times due to these promotive contents). So can you please help me? If all the characters played a person is cameo/ guest without even any citations, will it be approved in the case of Wikipedia? The person contacted me for requesting not to remove her article, she also added that she needs promotion by creating this article. Waiting for your valuable suggestions. I am helpless by fighting against this due to the less time that i have to spend on Wikipedia. A team of users is changing the article in every minutes and they have undone all the changes that I made. :( Hope you will check and revert me.Josu4u (talk) 14:28, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

@Josu4u: @Editor 2050: Hey, I'd like to comment since I believe I was one of the editors you're referring to. I hope that's all right. First, it probably fails Wikipedia policies on notability due to the lack of depth of coverage, and it most likely would be deleted in a WP:AFD discussion. However, my opposition was to a speedy deletion, so I removed the speedy deletion tag. The speedy deletion tag kept being added despite WP:CSD stating that uninvolved users are permitted to remove speedy deletion tags in favor of a different process such as WP:PROD for uncontroversial deletions and AFD for deletions that need consensus. While I'd rather not get into edit wars, I felt like preserving the integrity of the three types of deletion processes was important to Wikipedia, and flagging controversial deletions for speedy deletion is, in my view, not acceptable.
As a clarification: I did not remove the speedy deletion tag first. Another user, User:Editor 2050, removed the tag first and was also uninvolved with the article (I assume, no evidence of sockpuppetry).
Anyway, I'd love to get this situation resolved. As I stated before, I specifically was opposed to using the particular deletion process, because it's about a credible claim of significance rather than a notability constraint (which the article probably doesn't meet. I'd also love to get a third opinion, as my perspective is obviously also biased. Appable (talk) 14:46, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
PS: @Josu4u: Thanks for providing those other links, by the way. I looked over them and all of them were removed by A7 issues (not promotional content, but instead credible claim of significance). I can't access those previous revisions, but I'd argue that, at the state the article is now in, a credible claim of significance is included (namely, her roles in notable films). Actors in notable films almost always have a credible claim of significance and have a pretty good chance of being covered in reliable sources. So I think the best course of action would be to keep the article and likely move it to the appropriate location.
That's all my thoughts for now. Thanks for starting this discussion, Josu4u. It's valuable to be able to discuss these issues instead of being trapped in a perpetual edit war with other users, and obviously nobody wants that outcome. Appable (talk) 17:03, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
PS: @Appable: As for your information only in one reference I can find the name Shruthi. Then how the rest of the references without any mentions about Shruthi will become reference for the article? I think we can remove those contents where there's no mentions about Shruthi. I'm right?Josu4u (talk) 17:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
PS: @Appable: Consider that those reference's that didnot even a slight mention of Shruthi is removed, then tell me how it meet Wikipedia:Biographies of living personsJosu4u (talk) 17:44, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
It's probably an irrelevant discussion now, because the article will most likely be deleted due to lack of notability. There's already your vote for delete, and I've added a delete vote as well (I never thought it was notable, just that it had a credible claim of significance). If it survives deletion, we should discuss naming more. Glad this is starting to be resolved! Appable (talk) 19:23, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

ANI

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 05:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

No hope

The White Anglo-Saxon Protestant article has gotten to a point of no return, I guess. I'm tired of ‎Rjensen adding his bad/questionable references and I'm not sure what can be done now that he made a thousand edits in a row. All the info he adds are one-sided views. He only cites extreme left-wingers. Outedexits (talk) 04:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps I am being pessimistic. I intend to greatly improve this article later. I'll see what I can do Outedexits (talk) 06:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

I want to thank you for all your edits on White Anglo-Saxon Protestant article. They were all very helpful in my opinions. Thank you very much! Cheers, Outedexits (talk) 02:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

@Outedexits: Wikipedia is a work in progress. Sometimes it progresses quickly and painlessly, sometimes quickly and painfully like ripping a band-aid off and sometimes slowly, one poke at a time. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh

The edits about his allegations are no BLP violation. Please read here WP:WELLKNOWN Luckydhaliwal (talk) 21:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

It is you and not me who is involved in edit war. Check how many times have you reverted this edit. You are not interested in discussion as I wrote a message on your talk page and instead of replying to that you reverted my edit. Luckydhaliwal (talk) 21:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

@Luckydhaliwal: removing inappropriate WP:BLP violating content is one of the few exemptions for multiple reversions. The consensus on the talk page of experienced , non SPA editors is that the content is inappropriate. You can attempt to make your case for inclusion there. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, TheRedPenOfDoom. You have new messages at Luckydhaliwal's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you and I need your help

I was blocked in Frfench Wikipeedia without reason logic. I was editing my page Juan de Borja y Arnau in French and I wish to eraser because some Wikipedians have a personal interest in that did so. I was blockes and I can´t ending the erase. The person who blocked me also blocked me the option to communicate with the administrators. I need your help in pursuit to solve the problem. I wish to recover my count and erase my article "Juan de Borja y Arnau".

Thank you. --Ruiz-Mariño (talk) 22:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sam Sarpong.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sam Sarpong.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Route of the Borgias

Camino de Santiago or Camino del Cid and other many religious or cultural routes move a lot of tourism. Which is the problem??. The Route of the Borgias is the cultural heritage of the Borgia family in Spain. Where is the problem?. I can't understand you. I don't work in tourism, but is our cultural heritage and I love it. That's is all. Leave me work in peace in Wikipedia, please. Kind regards: --Valencian (talk) 18:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

deprod

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Miss Universe Romania, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! 2602:30A:2EFE:F050:6C6F:3B3D:9F18:9068 (talk) 19:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Ryan Castle?

I see you responded to my http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ryan-castle/wikipedia-deepak-chopra-o_b_8449394.html. Since you seem to know what is going on: do you know who Ryan Castle, "long experience as a Wikipedia editor", is - as a wiki editor I mean? William M. Connolley (talk) 15:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

@William M. Connolley: I don't know who Ryan Castle is but I do know that User talk:SAS81 was promotionally editing Chopra's Wikipedia article while angling for Chopra to support ISHAR. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:28, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
It's more complicated than that. I believe Chopra was highly involved in the creation of ISHAR, and remains involved, according to what sassy says at Talk:Chopra. Just an observation. -Roxy the dog™ woof 15:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
yes, "support" is perhaps not specific enough to encompass "provide initial funding and name recognition and involvement to get project off the ground" -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for that. Poking around I now see that the Huffpo has form: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/deepak-chopra/wikipedia-a-new-perspecti_b_5332504.html William M. Connolley (talk) 17:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Form indeed. -Roxy the dog™ woof 18:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

I think "Ryan Castle" might be SAS81 / Rome Viharo (aka Tumbleman). Here is RV. [Here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73BwMvEHLm0] is RC. Do they look the same to you? I'm crap at doing faces or voices, so could easily be wrong. [Here http://tedxtalks.ted.com/video/TEDxCARDIFF-Google-Consciousnes] is RV at TEDx William M. Connolley (talk) 21:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

AE2 case

Hi RedPen, I've removed the section (after checking with an arb) you added back to the evidence page as it is not evidence regarding the parties. Please don't revert another clerk action. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:39, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Of course the Arbs are not going to take responsibility for their incompetence which laid out the red carpet for the most recent round of disruption. Taking responsibility would be something that would help restore the community's faith the group and they seem dead set determined to shoot that down at every possible opportunity. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Hexbug

WP:CIVIL prevents me from describing your editing as it truly deserves, but do you really think that your simple laziness and refusal to ever contribute anything positive is really a nett benefit to the project? I cannot recall ever seeing you build something, or contribute anything useful. Is it beyond you? Andy Dingley (talk) 21:52, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your perception of me and my contributions is not on the list of things I care about. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! A Barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
Finally, a diligent and good editor is editing and removing the 99% of promotional content and puffery on the Bal des debutantes article. I applaud you for being an objective and good editor for this encyclopedia! Antipromotion (talk) 02:50, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Edit Review

I APOLOGIZE for offending your Group's processes on Teahouse several weeks ago. I was advised to go to the Teahouse from the Wikimedia Support Team, and I saw that I misunderstood the angle of approach and the platform for the Teahouse. All I can do is apologize for my error.

Please realize I do not understand the Wikipedia maze and am a rookie at this. We never asked to be on Wikipedia. The history shows a competitor putting us there and then tried to say the name was changed.

Everything I listed on the last change is in print; the changes on the first sentence is from the Peri article; “rumor campaign” is in the article as I listed the page and location. My comments on the Talk page were based on the article and the prior comments, which is why I listed the page locations.

Would you kindly repost my edit as it is directly from the Peri source?

Thank you for your understanding at my learning a new language and thank you for your assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiipedia-posting (talk • contribs) 19:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

@Wikiipedia-posting: I dont have time or connection speed right now to look into this, but I have asked for some experienced users to get involved. Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Potential_issues_at_Model_Mugging. I will check back later. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! Sorry to add this - I did reach out to another editor (BU Rob13) for posting review because he had posted in the past on the page history, but I did not see anything for at least a couple of weeks and I then noticed our edit comments were deleted from his page. This is why I made the change. If I can go through you or someone you can recommend would be very helpful. Again, thank you and I will wait your team's reassessment! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiipedia-posting (talk • contribs) 19:41, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much for working on this issue.

The only request I have is if you would kindly add the term “rumor campaigns” as part of that MJ article section. The rumor campaigns was a term directly stated in the article and was the admitted purpose of the article as it brings the situation more into perspective with the allegations. How about adding at the end of the first sentence, “but also admitted to engaging in rumor campaigns against the program.” ? Then, the last sentence regarding a historical addition is in reference to the source that describes their program being cancelled at Stanford in 1993 under Title IX was also deleted (old source #22).

Sorry that this has been such a pain for the entire political mess that happened so long ago. Having gone back and looked through old documents, this article was part of a larger ploy from numerous individuals to discredit Matt and take his ideas as their own; and it continued with how we were entered on Wikipedia as a page and how Nefariousski is trying to discredit MM on his Empowerment Self-Defense sandbox page.

Note - The first paragraph was also rewritten, but a more accurate source listed as reference #8 from Human Behavior Magazine was the FIRST article on MM and has historical background. However in the article, the female black belt was a fellow student with Matt attending classes, and afterward he "founded and developed" the program before others joined the program. There is no mention of the other four instructors in this 1978 publication because they did not join the program until the early 80’s. Even then, they came after a few other program contributors prior to the four instructors listed. The four listed were actually most instrumental in instructor training and sharing the program.

Again, thank you very much your assistance to take the time to review the material. It is appreciated!!! Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiipedia-posting (talk • contribs) 05:01, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

My Edit Request

I have edited Iss Pyaar Ko , By removing EBP content and and adding some details to the ipkknd regarding it being aired on MBC Bollywood and all and plus added Bulgaria version being aired. I removed EBP content from ipkknd page cause exactly it doesn't have any connection to ipkknd .And being a personally a ipkkndian I would not like personally something which is not related to ipkknd .Like EBP its just the title which is related but its not because of fans that EBP was made and EBP has a sperate page so I would like all the discussion of EBP should be on their page its self and one more thing which I have edited was the plot ending statement. I made the change more connective to the readers of the page . I hope you will understand and know why I have done these changes and accept it . DellzCreationz (talk) 14:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

@DellzCreationz: I dont actually understand what you have stated here at all, and we are not here to cater to fans. we are an encyclopedia. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:26, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Yeah ,you are absolutely right, its an encyclopedia so that's why I am saying .A encyclopedia means giving information right. So I have just added "IPKKND is dubbed in Arabic,Russian and Bulgarian also." "IPKKND is a star crossed love story". Fans are await for the return of this beautiful pair and they even call them the SRK and Kajol of Television Industry" its absolutely true and its type of information according to what and encyclopedia of IPKKND means and one more thing I would like to add to my message that the Ek Baar Phir content should not be added as a part of IPKKND cause its no where related to IPKKND.EBP is totally a different show .And not related to ipkknd cause we fans didn't consider that as a sequel to ipkknd so as a wiki pedia editor, there is another page for the EBP topic so this content would be more appropriate for that .IPKKNDians they don't consider EBP as a sequel . DellzCreationz (talk) 14:53, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

@DellzCreation: we are specifically NOT a fansite] nor a collection of trivia about which fans drool. We are an encyclopedia and require that content be sourced and presented in a neutral tone. "Fans are await for the return of this beautiful pair and they even call them the SRK and Kajol of Television Industry" is completely unacceptable on all counts. As is inserting the time slot and the other content that you keep attempting to insert. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

OK I understand regarding that Fans refer content,but regarding the dub versions which I updated, why that's being edited and regarding EBP ,its not applicable to do so.Its a totally different story line .Please remove that content out.And its not related to that page EXCEPT for the name .Please remove that content please .I understand regardinf my further details but what I added like Dub version and the EBP content to be removed that needs to be done . DellzCreationz (talk) 15:22, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

@DellzCreationz: you have 2 issues: 1) you need to verify your claim by providing a reliably published source then 2) you must gain consensus that such information merits inclusion as important aspect about the subject of the article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:24, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your response to my question about libel which I posted at the Teahouse the other day. (I didn't have a chance to thank you there before the page got archived.) I appreciate your help. Kekki1978 (talk) 17:53, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

FYI

You may find my remark to Zqxwcevrbtny on his talk page pertinent to your current discussion. John from Idegon (talk) 22:07, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Alina Foley

You redirected this article according to an AfD that closed as such (WP:Articles for deletion/Alina Foley), but it was apparently recreated, nominated, and then keep'd at a second AfD (WP:Articles for deletion/Alina Foley (2nd nomination)). I think you missed that one, I believe it would have to be put at AfD again if you think it should be a redirect. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 20:16, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

@Rainbow unicorn: given that at the AfD you mention barely squeaked by under a non-admin closure and in the 5 years that have passed there is STILL no significant coverage, i will stand by re instituting the redirect. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

&tv

Hello TRPOD. Can you see any reason why this article shouldn't be moved to &TV? They don't appear to put their title in lower case on their own website. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 03:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

@EdJohnston: I was just thinking the same thing, but was too lazy to look into it until you mentioned it. it looks like it was moved back in August [2] by User:Tamravidhir under the rationale "As per the channel's logo", which I dont think is valid. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
A bona fide controversy, so I've opened a move discussion at Talk:&tv. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Bengal Tiger

"Do not merely identify and describe the content of customary marketing methods". What does that mean? And, why the mention of first look is against the policy? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Pavanjandhyala, please see WP:TRAILER. Marketing sections that are based on customary marketing methods, like trailers and posters, etc. are not noteworthy. And frankly, they come off as a bit promotional, to me. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Bengal Tiger 2

  • Bro, U made edits to only this films marketing page!!! there are so many telugu released and upcoming movies in which the marketing section is written in the same way !!!
    • Some released movies also got a tag as GOOD articles etc ! so now ru going to edit all those telugu movie pages ! or else targeting to only some pages ! Fygu (talk) 14:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
  • @Fygu: if other articles are not in compliance with WP:TRAILER you are free to start cleaning them up. However, it is not a valid argument to state : "Look at all those other articles that are non-compliant. You cannot make this article compliant until those are compliant first." -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Happy Diwali!!!

Sky full of fireworks,
 Mouth full of sweets,
 Home full of lamps,
 And festival full of sweet memories...

Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali.
 §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:15, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Diwali greetings

Happy Diwali!!!

Sky full of fireworks,
 Mouth full of sweets,
 Home full of lamps,
 And festival full of sweet memories...

Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali.
 -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 06:51, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited King Neptune (statue), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC 13. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration Enforcement 2 talk page

Hey, TheRedPenOfDoom,
More allowance is given on arbitration case talk pages than on case pages but I would appreciate it if you could redact this edit. I'd prefer that you edit it to more suitable language that conveys the same sentiment. But if you choose not to, a clerk will redact it later today. Liz Read! Talk! 17:46, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Locks Brasserie

I am quite surprised that the article Locks Brasserie is hit by a tag that it needs more sources. It has eight different sources. Can you explain the problem? The Banner talk 18:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

@The Banner: - it doesnt have "8 different sources" - it has 3 acceptable news sources (one of which is duplicated as a separate footnote) and 4 links to twitter and its webpages / other non reliable sources. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Twitter is only used as source for its closure, not to prove notability. You are true at the point of the double sources, in effect it has five different sources, of which one is by now dead (but I guess you hammered that as unsuitable anyway) The Banner talk 18:36, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
@The Banner: I didnt tag it for notability on the basis of of twitter not establishing notability. I tagged it for better sources because half of the sources are substandard quality, including the source for one of the most important facts: that it has closed. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
I know, but because of your sources tag somebody else tagged it for notability. But I have been working on it and three of the despised sources are now gone. Later more, but dinner first. The Banner talk 19:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
@The Banner: ummm, You asked why I flagged. I explained a perfectly valid rationale for my flag. If you want to hold me responsible for what other people noticed and decided to flag for later , I cannot stop you, but quite frankly User:Theroadislong is an experienced editor who is quite capable of determining whether they feel an article merits a notability flag regardless of whether or not i have flagged for less than stellar sourcing. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:36, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Don't do so hyper. It was a kind of a scare to me and I am working on it. To solve the issues of you both. The Banner talk 20:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
I hope you think the present version is better. The Banner talk 20:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
@The Banner: Thanks for your work.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
[3] [4] [5] MarkBernstein (talk)

List of Tamil films of 2009

Hi TRPOD, I'd like to draw your attention to my comments at the GOCE Requests page. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:54, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

I've moved the conversation to the REQ talk page here; feel free to continue it there. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 Done; I've copied the new version of the table into the article; please review and feel free to adjust as needed; I'm done with this now. It's still in my sandbox if you need it. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 20:28, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

The Game of Death

Hello TheRedPenOfDoom: Category talk:The Game of Death#Contested deletion Bleackjoke (talk) 15:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Promotional tone in Draft:ZendyHealth

Hi, TRPoD, and thanks for all your great work at the Teahouse and elsewhere around Wikipedia. I'm following up on Robert McClenon's comment about Draft:ZendyHealth reading like an advertisement, and was wondering if you would be willing to look at the draft after my latest edits, since I've noticed you have a gift for cutting promotional puffery out of articles. I've rewritten some of it to address that issue, but apparently not enough. It may be that I've been looking at this draft long enough that I'm seeing the improvement over what it had been rather than what still needs to be changed, and it needs a fresh set of eyes. The draft creator hasn't had a problem with my previous removal of POV from the draft, so I'm sure your contributions would be welcome as well. Thanks in advance for whatever assistance you can offer. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 20:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

I: will say that both User:GrammarFascist and I are very good at recognizing promotional tone. TPROD is actually good at cutting it out. Some editors can recognize advertising, but fewer editors can get rid of it while leaving an article standing. Of course, often, there is no article when the advertising is thrown in the sink. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:47, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for that, Robert McClenon. I chose TRPoD specifically because they are a harsh critic of anything that can be construed as promotional. I doubt very much that a draft would fail AfC review on tone grounds after TRPoD had been at it — though it's true that, as you say, in some cases there's nothing much left of an article after the promotion is taken out. If you think I've removed such language adequately from the draft in its current form, however, that would be good enough for me. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 11:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Hip Hip Hurray (TV Series) Comment

Hello Red. I notice you have mentioned a weird comment while moving the talk page of the series [6]. I understand you moving it, but why would you showcase it as "Obscure TV Show". You might not have liked it, but I am a huge fan of it, and used to come from School quickly in order to watch it on Zee TV. Request you to make sure that comments are not made on some obscure judgements. Vishal Bakhai - Works 12:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

I had looked

at that edit at Toll Brothers and after checking the reference included decided that the information was okay to include in the lede. Especially check out the "Legal Issuses" (or something like that) in the reference. It is impressive. I would just as soon return it, but because you are an editor I respect, thought that I'd discuss it with you. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 19:42, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

King Neptune (statue)
added a link pointing to Cape Charles
MSCI
added a link pointing to FTSE

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

List of Telugu films of 2015

If you're looking for a project...

...may I suggest Kay Kay Menon? Did you know that Paanch "is considered to be a masterpiece by many, thanks to Menon's intense and charismatic performance"? --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Interpretation needed

What exactly are they talking about in the paragraph that begins ""while they are questionable"[1] -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:33, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

You posted the above message on the MSCI talk page. I don't understand the question: are you referring to a paragraph in the content that I submitted, or is it a paragraph in the book that your footnote refers to?

Frank Beck

Frank Beck (talk) 03:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

@Frank Beck: i have tried to clarify at Talk:MSCI/Archives/2015#interpretation_needed. The discussion can continue there. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:08, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Ping fixes

Noting your recent edit, to do these completely seamlessly: edit the post, fix the ping or your signature or whatever you've goofed, then add a new section header just below the thread exactly the same as the current one; ping the person and sign; click save; click edit again and nuke the new section. This way, the "pingee" gets a ping to the existing section, exactly as if you did it right the first time – since the thread you added and erased was in a section headlined the same as the existing one. To wit, this + this.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:34, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Deleting edits

Good night!

I'm adding reliable sources and citations to the article I'm writing, as everyone can see on the footnotes and reference boxes. "Article already practically void of the required sourcing", I don't understand what you mean by that. The new entries were copied from other wikipedia articles about the same category and I did refered to them on my "edit summary". Like I said, I'm new here but I'm learning fast. I will edit all over again, I don't think there was nothing wrong to what it was written. PedroLopFonMarAlves (talk) 03:13, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

After the fact...

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:TheRedPenOfDoom_reported_by_User:StigmaUncured_.28Result:_Declined.29. --NeilN talk to me 20:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Diyar-e-Dil

May be because this time you are poking yourself away a lot, but problem is that you also failed to understand our point. Our media outlets, generally online printed media includes Review it, Brandsynaro and Galaxy Lollywood. They are not poor references, we are not in Hollywood where printed media such as Hollywood reporter, variety, Guardian, New York Times, TV Guide, LA Times or all other acclaim mediums who released entertainment news on major level, our media industry mainly confined to TV medium and to us they are proper sources, howevernewspaper such as Aaaj News, Dawn News, Express Tribune release news regarding showbiz of television or their details and production but very often, so in that case we have to use references like that. But they are not poor. But of course it is useless to talk to you that's why i never talk to you on this issue. Nauriya (talk) 21:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

A Sound of Thunder
added a link pointing to Golden Apples of the Sun
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon?
added a link pointing to Bengali

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

AN notification

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Not canvassing per the definition, but pretty darn close, as an editor has taken issue with your talk page statement regarding the Arbcom election. Resolute 14:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

whigfield page reply

The point of what I was saying both on the whigfield page and the Ann Lee talk page is exactly that, we need to go by what is provable and not by voice sound. Did you miss what I said on both pages or are you just ignoring it just because I'm Mancunian? If you read it, then you'd see that I aggree with everyone who says that we can't include the speculation of Annerley Gordon benig Whigfield untill we have proof that she is other than "she sounds like her so therefore that's who sings her songs." Infact, I don't even think that there should be any mention of the theory of Annerley being Whigfield's real singer anywhere in the article untill it gets covered in a well-known and reliable publication. Don't you see? I'm on your side? I know I'm Mancunian and all, but I at least aggree with you here.


Eric Ramus


03:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.195.166.103 (talk)

Ruth Dillon (horse)

Hi, just now saw your comment on Wikipedia talk about notability in sports. The horse probably meets notability and I'd be willing to create or help work on the article. I'm technically a member of the horseracing project, but I haven't done much work there because most of the major Thoroughbred articles are starts or GA. This would be a good way to get more involved there. White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 00:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi @White Arabian Filly:! I started at Draft:Ruth Dillon but i am tired and from the multiple tabs I have open must have gotten the wrong URL at least once because i have the same book down three times! and i cannot find the write up that i had a few weeks ago where the trainer was talking about plans for her as a two year old, not racing and just going for a better world record than her sister. (I am also very confused how Lou Dillon set a record of under 2 minute mile in 1903 these over 2 minute times in 1907-08 are still "records"? )
As another horse article, her father Sidney Dillon (horse) looks like he was a major stud of the time ( one of the world's greatest sires and a big write up here ) and might be a project for you.
Feel free to have at either one! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, I did a little work on Ruth Dillon and may create her sire's article today or tomorrow. White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 14:46, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Zwarte Piet

Why are my additions removed while still busy? I'm a true and severe editor for wiki but think I'll quit. Lenasevan (talk) 21:15, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

@Lenasevan: I reverted your "true and severe" edits for the reason I explained on your talk page: Hello, I reverted your recent edits to Zwarte Piet because you did not provide any verification of the claims by providing a citation or footnote or link to a reliably published source showing where the information came from.
If you are doing any editing of Wikipedia other than grammar and spelling corrections you will need to provide sources for the content you wish to add. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:46, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Kent Hovind's page

I added the mug shot of Kent Hovind back to the article. See the archival talk page for the reason why it is allowed as well as this previous argument. Unless Kent provides a more recent photo, the current image should stay.--Cms13ca (talk) 15:40, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Are your ears burning?

[7][8] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

That is absolutely hilarious. :D —Psychonaut (talk) 16:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Kent Hovind

Stop edit warring please. --NeilN talk to me 17:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

All Star Mr and Mrs

Hi RPOD, How are you? I just wanted some clarifications on the recent edits on the All Star Mr. and Mrs. page. I was wondering about the removal of the Episode numbers in the grids as well as the number of episodes in the infobox. I've seen those in countless other Wikipedia pages for other game shows, panel shows and talk shows in the UK and the US. (Some pages were even edited and verified by users AldezD an Bentvfan who edit a lot of the game and panel shows) Also, I noticed tht you got ric ov the note I wrote about all the couples being together at the time of filming, as I didn't want random editors editing a couple's current relationship status for an episode in Series 1 if by Series 7 they broke up.

I know that you are adamant about sources. Unfortunately, ITV is not like the BBC and they don't have pages with episode guides. The closest I could find was press releases from ITV Media as well as episode guides from Radio Times where they list all the episodes. I know that there are various other panel and game showx that list "List of Episode links" from Tv.com Radio Times and the like on the bottom of episode guides. Is this helpful? Here is the link from Radio Times. http://www.radiotimes.com/programme/fbsr/all-star-mr--mrs

I hope this is helpful and can be added to the page. I am not one to argue and not a senior editor like you. I am just trying to understand and help out in any way I can, telling you what I have seen on other Wiki pages of the same ilk tht have been edited by other more experienced editors than myself. Hope that's all right. Thanks! 66.130.12.185 (talk) 16:54, 29 November 2015 (UTC)samusek2

Sorry to bother you, but I was just curious as to what the first paragraph meant. I was just confused as I have seen episode pages on Wikipedia for other like-minded shows with episode guide source links on the bottom and gave you the closest thing to an episode guide with numbers that I could find. I was just trying to be helpful. Also, as for the second part, woud you be able to create a hidden message likd you did on my talk page? 66.130.12.185 (talk) 17:28, 29 November 2015 (UTC)samusek2

A kitten for you!

Thank you for your trust and suggestion. I appreciate you!

jdxzhu 18:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Chos3n proposed Deletion

(81.140.67.187 (talk) 11:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC))Thank you for being an ambassador of fairness and aware of Cultural diversity which helps Wikipedia with their Bias issues. 

Wikipedia needs more editors like you (81.140.67.187 (talk) 11:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC))

Juliette Farrell

bigg boss 9 edit

Dear, i just want to say that u are again and again updating wrong information of bigg boss 9. Currently the captain of house is not kishwar. Its priya malik.. and 2nd ly keith did not return on day 45 . He returned on day 48... so i an changing these 2 things. Better dnt change them wrong again.. 1st is keith returned on day 48. 2nd is captain is priya malik. Dinesh kanwar singh (talk) 13:10, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

@Dinesh kanwar singh: and again, you have provided no sources to validate such claims and have again inappropriately utilized the improper informal personal address utilizing personal names. We are not their besties and this is not a fan page. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Someone created a section about you on WP:ANI.

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. See here. --Aquillion (talk) 02:44, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic List of converts to Hinduism from Islam. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan (TALK) 18:38, 4 December 2015 (UTC) (DRN volunteer)

Hi TheRedPenOfDoom, just checking to see if you will be participating at this stage in the DRN case? You can join in at anytime, as well as leave, but non-participation can result in closure of a case in some circumstances. I am a DRN volunteer looking to accept the case for open discussion, but I would prefer all parties to be present before hand or at least know where they stand. Cheers, Drcrazy102 (talk) 09:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Oi!

Hi TRPOD, I will be closing the DRN case unless you or D4iNa4 will be participating due to a non-dispute. If you wish to participate, please either reply here with a {{User}} ping or create an acceptance section under my conditions of case acceptance. You do not have to participate, but it would be appreciated if you actually responded to say that you will or won't be participating either on your talkpage (here) or at the DRN case. Cheers, Drcrazy102 (talk) 00:48, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Sockfarm you probably dealt with

Hi! Surfing through histories over at TfD of Box Office India I realized that maybe you have dealt a lot with a puppet Nehapant19 (talk · contribs · count). I recently noticed that she is/was an employee of a PR firm called Exchange4media.com / Exchange4media. I have added some info about it at User:Dharmadhyaksha/Promotional cases. Can you add more light to the case? Maybe you know the trends of how they worked and some WP:DUCKy ways to identify them? The firm and its subsidiaries firms have been used plenty number of times over here as sources and that smells fishy to me. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:52, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Are you still around?

do you still edit?Winterysteppe (talk) 21:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:01, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Editor seeking help

I thought you might find this interesting. I trust you will give all appropriate help :) Alsee (talk) 03:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Chos3n deletion

Thank you for your support in the systemic Bias of the deletion of my page.

I have now unfortunately had the page deleted. Is there any way we can appeal? Thank you ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.140.67.187 (talk) 12:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

MERRY CHRISTMAS

Wishing you a Wonderful Christmas and Happy New Year Chos3n — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.140.67.187 (talk) 12:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement 2 case closed

You are receiving this message because you are a party or offered a preliminary statement and/or evidence in the Arbitration enforcement 2 case. This is a one-time message.

The Arbitration enforcement 2 arbitration case (t) (ev / t) (w / t) (pd / t) has been closed, and the following remedies have been enacted:

1.1) The Arbitration Committee confirms the sanctions imposed on Eric Corbett as a result of the Interactions at GGTF case, but mandates that all enforcement requests relating to them be filed at arbitration enforcement and be kept open for at least 24 hours.

3) For his breaches of the standards of conduct expected of editors and administrators, Black Kite is admonished.

6) The community is reminded that discretionary sanctions have been authorised for any page relating to or any edit about: (i) the Gender Gap Task Force; (ii) the gender disparity among Wikipedians; and (iii) any process or discussion relating to these topics, all broadly construed.

For the Arbitration Committee, Kharkiv07 (T) 02:41, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration enforcement 2 case closed
May our mouth be full of laughter, a comment from a psalm, with music 290 years old today, Forget arbcom (I didn't keep that on my talk), and celebrate Christmas! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:24, 25 December 2015 (UTC)


Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 16:20, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


Savvyjack23 (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Savvyjack23 (talk) 07:48, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, TRPoD!

TRPoD, I wish you and those dear to you
golden days of love and joy in a
Happy New Year 2016!
It's been a while, but I hope you are well.
Best regards,
Sam Sailor Talk! 00:14, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Pass on!
Send this greeting by adding {{subst:User:Sam Sailor/Templates/HappyNewYear}} to user talk pages.
Information icon Automatic level-2 heading and auto-signing included.
(Unknown artist, Norway, 1916)

Thanks.

Hope you enjoy your new year, I sadly shall not be continuing on Wikipedia, so you'll have one less obtrusive editor to worry about!


Sorry for all the trouble I haven't caused you. Unofficialeditor (talk) 22:45, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

RfC announce: Religion in infoboxes

There is an RfC at Template talk:Infobox#RfC: Religion in infoboxes concerning what What should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:37, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

how?

how can you slap?  05:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by James J. Lambden (talk • contribs)

Missing

Just advising that I have added you to Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians, [9]. 220 of Borg 19:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

AMU socks again?

Seems like while we got busy elsewhere, the AMU socks were back. See Category:Aligarh Muslim University which has been populated again with many halls and clubs and faculties. I will take a look at this next week. But meanwhile if you have time, feel free to prowl through. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:16, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

You are missed

Come back. --1.39.56.38 (talk) 04:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Leukophobia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leukophobia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leukophobia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Bigg Boss 10

Hello there, Hope you are doing well. I have a request for you if you can please visit Talk:Bigg Boss 10#Voting history and vote count and share your opinion. I removed the voting history and vote count tables per WP:UNDUE but some SPA user and IP's are keep adding it back and I don't want to be involved into edit war. Thank you – GSS (talk) 11:35, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TheRedPenOfDoom. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Merry, merry!

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:50, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Long overdue recognition

The Editor's Barnstar
In recognition of particularly fine editing decisions:

I hadn't visited Greek mythology in popular culture since it was a list article in which I had proposed some criteria for inclusion to help remove the chaff. Only now I noticed the herculean effort you performed in 2012 to restructure it completely, transforming it from a fancruft-attracting list article into a useful, informative, and more compelling presentation of prose. Thanks. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Miss you

It's been a long time since I've seen your name in my watchlist. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:09, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Deleting article Wasi Shah

Hello! I know that this article was deleted previously, but it doesn't mean that you delete all articles that are completely change than previous article of same name. Now listen:

Stop iconInformation icon: Wikipedia gives you last warning to not delete wanted pages and very valuable pages otherwise you will be loss of editing. Many years before you had deleted this but I forgiven. But your attempt was too hard. Now reply, pagal insaan. International Editor Shah (talk) 13:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

I've responded to this on your talk page, Shah. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:51, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on

This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at:

Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: Allow private schools to be characterized as non-affiliated as well as religious, in infobox?

Specifically, it asks that "religion = none" be allowed in the infobox.

The first RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' " and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, institutions etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "in any article".

The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

The result of that RfC was that the "in all Wikipedia articles, without exception, nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.".

Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Edit Request

I think the User:Rishika.dhanawade has added some unnecessary content through https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karan_Singh_Grover&diff=683440263&oldid=682956824 to Karan Singh Grover. Please can you remove it. Regards., Digvijay411 (talk) 2:54, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Edit request

Hello!!!!! TheRedPenOfDoom I have made some recent edits to Hera Pheri 3 added and removed some content.There was a lot of irrelevant content in the article. I tried to make some changes as they are being verified by well known bollywood celebrity news website(Pinkvilla and others). After your edit I am guessing you made something wrong and deleted some important lines and stories. Please revert it to it's earlier state. Regards, Jashafi24 (talk) 8:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Aahil Raza Ibrahim

I have again opened the article Aahil Raza Ibrahim as now it has been improved and provided reliable references from newspapers User:Rishika.dhanawade — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rishika.dhanawade (talk • contribs)

Back in 2013 you deleted several external links from the Sutro Baths page...

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sutro_Baths&type=revision&diff=584939912&oldid=584939840

One of those links was to this pages: http://www.cliffhouseproject.com/environs/sutrobaths/sutro_baths.htm

This is a site I maintain. This page contains more Sutro Baths historical photographs than you will find anywhere, many from my own collection. There are no ads or malicious content. The national park service links to my website for historical information. What was the purpose of your deletion?

gary — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.84.116.86 (talk • contribs)

Edit request

Hello!!! TheRedPenOfDoom I have made some recent edits to Karanvir Bohra added and removed some content.Some user thinks that there is lot of irrelevant content in the article. Please can you help improving it.Please can you remove the data you feel is irrelevant. Regards, Rishika.dhanawade (talk) 5:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Edit Request

Hello!!! TheRedPenOfDoom, Thank you for fullfilling my request and improving the article Karanvir Bohra. I also want to make a request to you to remove all the unnecessary trivia from the page Karan Singh Grover.It has too much of unnecessary stuff in the personal life section. Even in the career section things such as the actor being mobbed in public places and being appreciated by costars and colleagues have been added which I feel is inappropriate to be added over there. I had tried removing the content some time ago. But there is some user Durr-e-shehwar who again reverts my edits.Please can you take some steps against improvement of the article.

Regards,

Rishika.dhanawade (talk) 4:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Warning2

Stop iconInformation icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Forrester Research

I see you removed a reference to Forrester Research. Isn't it encyclopedic?NSpehler (talk) 2:32, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Poor ref on DeD

Pen, i clearly understood your point i always have, that's why i never interrupt on the edits of other editors you undid. But in my case i am confident that my content is true and authentic, and is written in a way it should be written. And your concern with the sources, i am removing as less important references as i can. I already deleted refrences that were twice used or according to you is not ok. Tell me you remove my critical reception part, where as strong sources were presented such as Dawn News and Aaaj News, in rating section i used official and authentic Broadcasters' Audience Research Board references and BizAsia an Indian online rating channel for UKs programming. Tell me are these invalid or Crap sources?.

I am not user Sammy.joseph who is new to Wikipedia, i have made series of an article and they are believed to be good and never question. In Pakistan Television Industry media sources are very few who are acclaimed but that doesn't mean they are crap. No matter how much you referred me to Wikipedia policies or rules, i know them very well. I am asking you to believe in my edits and i will try to clean as much CRAP as possible and actually i always have. Fushan007 Talk 9:244, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

why did you delete image

it said you deleted an image from the page harley huke for copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lux44-musicpages (talk • contribs)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheRedPenOfDoom/Archive_20&oldid=1086008425"