User contributions for 173.54.237.167
Appearance
Results for 173.54.237.167 talk block log logs global block log filter log
24 February 2011
- 01:2101:21, 24 February 2011 diff hist +18 Talk:Shocker Toys No edit summary
23 February 2011
- 20:4920:49, 23 February 2011 diff hist +18 Shocker Toys No edit summary
- 20:4720:47, 23 February 2011 diff hist −687 User talk:173.54.237.167 stay off my page as you are COI
- 18:1418:14, 23 February 2011 diff hist +46 Shocker Toys No edit summary
- 18:1018:10, 23 February 2011 diff hist −14 Shocker Toys none of Pariah74's changes have any facts backing them and this is an attempt to skew the article not better it.
- 14:2514:25, 23 February 2011 diff hist +661 Talk:Shocker Toys →Toy Fair 2011
- 14:1614:16, 23 February 2011 diff hist +3,900 Talk:Shocker Toys →Toy Fair 2011
- 13:4713:47, 23 February 2011 diff hist +38,448 Talk:Shocker Toys There is no archiving these are sections pertaining to the editing of the article.
21 February 2011
- 22:2822:28, 21 February 2011 diff hist +1,016 Talk:Shocker Toys →Toy Fair 2011
- 17:5017:50, 21 February 2011 diff hist +2,129 Talk:Shocker Toys →Toy Fair 2011
- 17:4817:48, 21 February 2011 diff hist −2,067 Talk:Shocker Toys placed in wrong section
- 17:4717:47, 21 February 2011 diff hist +2,067 Talk:Shocker Toys →editing conflict
- 14:2314:23, 21 February 2011 diff hist −34 Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard →Shocker Toys
- 14:2314:23, 21 February 2011 diff hist +7 Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard →Shocker Toys
- 14:2214:22, 21 February 2011 diff hist +17 Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard →Shocker Toys
- 14:2114:21, 21 February 2011 diff hist +1,198 Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard No edit summary
- 14:0114:01, 21 February 2011 diff hist +1,070 Talk:Shocker Toys →Toy Fair 2011
- 13:5413:54, 21 February 2011 diff hist −4,866 Talk:Shocker Toys This section is meant for the courts and lawyers not for Wiki
- 01:5401:54, 21 February 2011 diff hist 0 Talk:Shocker Toys →Toy Fair 2011
- 01:5301:53, 21 February 2011 diff hist +1 Talk:Shocker Toys →Toy Fair 2011
- 01:5201:52, 21 February 2011 diff hist +637 Talk:Shocker Toys →Toy Fair 2011
- 01:4601:46, 21 February 2011 diff hist −2,659 Talk:Shocker Toys The last section is a joke and meant for a lawyer and not wiki. Again they are showing their COI bigtime.
20 February 2011
- 20:0920:09, 20 February 2011 diff hist +1,032 Talk:Shocker Toys →Toy Fair 2011
- 15:0915:09, 20 February 2011 diff hist +770 Talk:Shocker Toys →Toy Fair 2011
19 February 2011
- 16:3716:37, 19 February 2011 diff hist +832 Talk:Shocker Toys No edit summary
19 January 2011
- 15:4515:45, 19 January 2011 diff hist +187 Shocker Toys ShockerHelp are you some sort of authority on their business? I think that is conflict of interest (red flag)
13 January 2011
- 22:4122:41, 13 January 2011 diff hist 0 Shocker Toys No edit summary
- 22:4022:40, 13 January 2011 diff hist 0 Shocker Toys It clearly states 2000 on their sites and articles it seems this mention of them got the date wrong
- 22:3922:39, 13 January 2011 diff hist +41 Shocker Toys →Indie Spotlight
- 22:3822:38, 13 January 2011 diff hist +110 Shocker Toys they have released a few licensed Malllows
- 22:3422:34, 13 January 2011 diff hist +35 Shocker Toys there was never any announcement that Adult Swim took away the license from Shocker Toys
7 February 2010
- 20:1720:17, 7 February 2010 diff hist +9 Shocker Toys No edit summary
- 20:1420:14, 7 February 2010 diff hist +298 Talk:Shocker Toys →editing conflict
5 February 2010
- 15:3815:38, 5 February 2010 diff hist +985 Talk:Shocker Toys →editing conflict
- 15:3115:31, 5 February 2010 diff hist +495 Talk:Shocker Toys →Awards and Recognitions
25 January 2010
- 14:3014:30, 25 January 2010 diff hist −304 Shocker Toys →Other Spotlight lines: This is hearsay and nothing was shown for any of these products in prototype form or 2-d artwork so it does not belong here until that happens. Tag: section blanking
- 14:2714:27, 25 January 2010 diff hist +21 Shocker Toys Mallows have made licensed products as well as blanks and are available in Mass retail seperating them from the excluisve that some people choose to group them with.
- 14:2614:26, 25 January 2010 diff hist 0 Shocker Toys Year 2000 start date is what is shown everywhere I look. I think the one source cited may have made a mistake as the other sources cite 2000 as start date.
- 14:2514:25, 25 January 2010 diff hist −230 Shocker Toys How dare anyone accuse me of making this page a commercial! I am just making the page more balanced and I have my right to do so. Tag: references removed
19 January 2010
- 14:4014:40, 19 January 2010 diff hist +280 Talk:Shocker Toys →Discussions
- 14:3714:37, 19 January 2010 diff hist −616 Shocker Toys →Awards and recognition: all the picks by Michael are his personal opinion and not fact or shared opinions. I have left the people picks as they represent a gathered vote.
- 14:3214:32, 19 January 2010 diff hist +401 Shocker Toys Undid revision 338704380 by ShockerHelp (talk) Wow reasons listed for revert is our changes were junk.
- 00:0200:02, 19 January 2010 diff hist +1,050 Shocker Toys It says the license ended for them not that Adult Swim took it away from them. Licenses expire after a period of time from what I gather. Also it is a released product being sold online by stores.
18 January 2010
- 23:5723:57, 18 January 2010 diff hist −994 Shocker Toys →Gwar and Metalocalypse Tag: references removed
- 23:5123:51, 18 January 2010 diff hist 0 Shocker Toys All ref including the archived about page for Shocker Toys state the company was started in 2000
- 23:4323:43, 18 January 2010 diff hist +345 Shocker Toys →Mallows
17 January 2010
- 23:1323:13, 17 January 2010 diff hist +313 Shocker Toys I agree with Nat's version
12 January 2010
- 14:1214:12, 12 January 2010 diff hist +429 Shocker Toys →Products: Mallows are in Hastings so they are now their own product not just an exclusive call hastings if you do not believe it
- 14:0614:06, 12 January 2010 diff hist +853 Shocker Toys →Indie Spotlight: Series2 was shown at SDCC so it was more then announced stop making it look like there isn't a series2 also stop deleting a well known source Washington Times article.
- 13:4613:46, 12 January 2010 diff hist +457 Shocker Toys →Awards and recognition: Thw positive awards stay you have made no clear reason why they shouldnt beyond accusations that the sites are working with Shocker Toys which is unfounded and untrue