User contributions for 2600:1001:B129:1728:EC19:6226:642B:1B69
Appearance
Results for 2600:1001:B129:1728:EC19:6226:642B:1B69 talk block log logs global block log filter log
1 August 2016
- 21:1221:12, 1 August 2016 diff hist +190 History of Pakistan →Soomra dynasty: content is not disputed
- 21:0921:09, 1 August 2016 diff hist +18 Umayyad campaigns in India They are Muslim Rajputs, this is not disputed
- 21:0721:07, 1 August 2016 diff hist +25 Sindh →Soomra dynasty period: they are Muslim Rajput
- 21:0421:04, 1 August 2016 diff hist +27 Muslim Rajputs →Soomra dynasty: they are Rajput
- 21:0221:02, 1 August 2016 diff hist +55 Khafif He is Sindhi Rajput, why remove it?
- 21:0121:01, 1 August 2016 diff hist +42 History of Sindh →Medieval era: they were Muslim Rajputs. It is not disputed
- 20:5920:59, 1 August 2016 diff hist +18 Dodo Bin Khafef Soomro III They were Muslim Rajputs, it is undisputed. Why remove it?
- 20:5620:56, 1 August 2016 diff hist +64 Soomra dynasty They are Sindhi Rajput, why are you removing it? It is not disputed they were something else, if so, please explain
- 20:5320:53, 1 August 2016 diff hist +11 Soomro Sindhi Rajput is their identity, why remove the Rajput part?
- 20:4920:49, 1 August 2016 diff hist +835 Soomro Undid revision 732569903 by Sitush (talk) I provided two sources, which states they are Sindhi Rajput.
- 20:4720:47, 1 August 2016 diff hist +224 Soomra dynasty Undid revision 732570068 by Sitush (talk) what is wrong with having multiple sources?
- 20:4420:44, 1 August 2016 diff hist +853 Khafif Add references
- 20:3820:38, 1 August 2016 diff hist +250 Samma dynasty Add reference
- 20:3520:35, 1 August 2016 diff hist +835 Soomro Add two references
- 20:3420:34, 1 August 2016 diff hist +224 Soomra dynasty Add Reference
- 20:3220:32, 1 August 2016 diff hist +15 Umayyad campaigns in India Improve
- 20:3020:30, 1 August 2016 diff hist +43 Umayyad campaigns in India Soomra and Samma
- 20:2820:28, 1 August 2016 diff hist +45 Umayyad campaigns in India Fix spelling and minor edit