User contributions for JakeInJoisey (usurped)

17 October 2011

• 23:5123:51, 17 October 2011 diff hist −6 m Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Comments: tense correction
• 23:4923:49, 17 October 2011 diff hist +181 m Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Comments: meta format comment; wikilink
• 23:3823:38, 17 October 2011 diff hist +409 Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →RfC clarification

16 October 2011

• 02:3502:35, 16 October 2011 diff hist −855 Campaign for the neologism "santorum" rmv content per RFC closure

15 October 2011

• 01:2401:24, 15 October 2011 diff hist +1 m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →"uninvolved closure request: punc
• 01:2201:22, 15 October 2011 diff hist +146 User talk:JakeInJoisey →no consensus: +afterthought
• 01:1701:17, 15 October 2011 diff hist +400 User talk:JakeInJoisey →no consensus
• 01:0801:08, 15 October 2011 diff hist +335 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →"uninvolved closure request
• 01:0101:01, 15 October 2011 diff hist +525 User talk:JakeInJoisey →no consensus
• 00:5200:52, 15 October 2011 diff hist +1,189 User talk:JakeInJoisey →no consensus
• 00:2500:25, 15 October 2011 diff hist −2 Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Does the characterization "vulgar" satisfy WP:NPOV and WP:LEAD notability considerations for presentation in the lead?: renew RFC closure admin request
• 00:2400:24, 15 October 2011 diff hist +150,657 Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" Undid revision 455587741 by Off2riorob (talk) RV - RFC not closed

8 October 2011

• 17:1217:12, 8 October 2011 diff hist −1,312 Gretchen Carlson →Controversy: rmv banality; could it be more trite?

3 October 2011

• 22:3122:31, 3 October 2011 diff hist −76 Campaign for the neologism "santorum" Undid revision 453778522 by Harizotoh9 (talk) rmv photo per WP:BLP and prior discussion
• 22:2722:27, 3 October 2011 diff hist +105 m Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Comments: +wikilink @anythingyouwant
• 22:1722:17, 3 October 2011 diff hist +1,037 Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Comments: @anythingyouwant
• 18:4718:47, 3 October 2011 diff hist −105 m Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →RfC clarification: rv attempted RFC formatting problem - assumed author comments should not be presented on the RFC page - perhaps someone else knows how to fix
• 18:4318:43, 3 October 2011 diff hist −1 m Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →RfC clarification: didn't work - trying again
• 18:4118:41, 3 October 2011 diff hist +107 Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →RfC clarification: refactor - adding assumed missing author sig to isolate RFC question from comments
• 16:5916:59, 3 October 2011 diff hist +223 Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Comments: wikilink @Anythingyouwant
• 16:4216:42, 3 October 2011 diff hist +300 Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Comments: @anythingyouwant
• 16:2316:23, 3 October 2011 diff hist −1 m Campaign for the neologism "santorum" punc cleanup
• 16:1216:12, 3 October 2011 diff hist +25 Campaign for the neologism "santorum" nor was it a benign sexual "term"
• 14:3714:37, 3 October 2011 diff hist −445 Campaign for the neologism "santorum" restore content as it existed prior to recent spate of edit warring - the use of "vulgar" as an unattributed characterization "in "wikipedia's voice" was rejected by consensus
• 13:5013:50, 3 October 2011 diff hist +1 m Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Sourcing for "santorum" definition characterization: updated timestamp for revised section
• 13:4513:45, 3 October 2011 diff hist +247 Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Sourcing for "santorum" definition characterization: add recent NY Times cite
• 00:2500:25, 3 October 2011 diff hist +7 m Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Comments: for vote continuity
• 00:0500:05, 3 October 2011 diff hist +1 Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Comments: sp - No change vote
• 00:0200:02, 3 October 2011 diff hist +351 Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →RfC clarification

1 October 2011

• 16:3216:32, 1 October 2011 diff hist −14 Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Santorum's request that Google intervene: rmv unwarranted and probable POV characterization of source
• 16:2116:21, 1 October 2011 diff hist +62 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection →{{la|Campaign for "santorum" neologism}}: clarify
• 16:1716:17, 1 October 2011 diff hist +11 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection →{{la|Campaign for "santorum" neologism}}: revised
• 16:1416:14, 1 October 2011 diff hist +371 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection →Current requests for protection
• 15:5915:59, 1 October 2011 diff hist −84 Campaign for the neologism "santorum" Undid revision 453381707 by Johnllama (talk) Your edit is not consensus-based and currently under discussion
• 13:4813:48, 1 October 2011 diff hist +387 Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Google is irrelevant to the first sentence
• 12:1912:19, 1 October 2011 diff hist +188 Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Google is irrelevant to the first sentence
• 08:1008:10, 1 October 2011 diff hist +450 Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Google is irrelevant to the first sentence
• 07:2607:26, 1 October 2011 diff hist +458 Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Google is irrelevant to the first sentence

30 September 2011

• 03:2803:28, 30 September 2011 diff hist 0 Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Does the characterization "vulgar" satisfy WP:NPOV and WP:LEAD notability considerations for presentation in the lead?: Updated closure request

25 September 2011

• 18:3518:35, 25 September 2011 diff hist −314 Campaign for the neologism "santorum" →Santorum's request that Google intervene: rmv irrelevancy - we generally don't provide anecdotal asides on cited sources

21 September 2011

• 19:2419:24, 21 September 2011 diff hist +33 Brooklyn Eagle ce
• 19:2319:23, 21 September 2011 diff hist −125 Brooklyn Eagle rmv factual innaccuracy / needs rewrite with sourcing
• 19:2019:20, 21 September 2011 diff hist 0 Brooklyn Eagle ce
• 19:1919:19, 21 September 2011 diff hist +1 m Brooklyn Eagle punc
• 19:1819:18, 21 September 2011 diff hist −58 Brooklyn Eagle ce, rmv redundancy
• 19:1719:17, 21 September 2011 diff hist −1 Brooklyn Eagle ce
• 19:1719:17, 21 September 2011 diff hist −1 Brooklyn Eagle ce
• 07:2407:24, 21 September 2011 diff hist −583 Allen West (politician) rv per WP:BLP, WP:OR

15 September 2011

• 20:1120:11, 15 September 2011 diff hist +1 Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum" /* Does the characterization "vulgar" satisfy WP:NPOV and WP:LEAD notability considerations... / update request

12 September 2011

• 04:0204:02, 12 September 2011 diff hist −13 WorldNetDaily Undid revision 449864633 by Aoa8212 (talk) rv - no need for name