User contributions for Macgruder

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

10:1810:18, 22 September 2008 diff hist +90 User:Macgruder No edit summary current
07:1207:12, 22 September 2008 diff hist +1,656 Talk:Liancourt Rocks →Comments

19:4019:40, 21 September 2008 diff hist +214 User talk:Nihonjoe →I'm going to give LR a rest: new section
19:3519:35, 21 September 2008 diff hist +1,849 Talk:Liancourt Rocks →Comments
18:2918:29, 21 September 2008 diff hist +95 Talk:Liancourt Rocks →Comments
18:2518:25, 21 September 2008 diff hist +128 Talk:Liancourt Rocks →Comments
18:2018:20, 21 September 2008 diff hist +128 Talk:Liancourt Rocks →Comments
18:0118:01, 21 September 2008 diff hist +51 m Talk:Liancourt Rocks →Comments
17:5617:56, 21 September 2008 diff hist +253 Talk:Liancourt Rocks →Comments
17:5317:53, 21 September 2008 diff hist +326 Talk:Liancourt Rocks →Comments
17:5117:51, 21 September 2008 diff hist +1 m Talk:Liancourt Rocks fix
17:4917:49, 21 September 2008 diff hist +2,856 Talk:Liancourt Rocks →Comments
11:1011:10, 21 September 2008 diff hist +225 User talk:Macgruder →William Nierenberg and WP:3RR
10:1610:16, 21 September 2008 diff hist +857 Talk:Liancourt Rocks →Comments

20:1720:17, 20 September 2008 diff hist −54 William Nierenberg "Instead, it rejected the interpretation of those facts as a problem." clarified rather than reduced to 'the report was largely in line with' "twaddle". Have report, don't need blog cite.
20:1320:13, 20 September 2008 diff hist +1 Talk:William Nierenberg →Jolly edit wars
20:1220:12, 20 September 2008 diff hist +983 Talk:William Nierenberg →Jolly edit wars
20:0320:03, 20 September 2008 diff hist +46 William Nierenberg No edit summary
10:3810:38, 20 September 2008 diff hist +243 User talk:William M. Connolley →William Nierenberg
10:3510:35, 20 September 2008 diff hist −434 User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen →4th 'revert' is not a revert
10:3410:34, 20 September 2008 diff hist −400 User talk:Macgruder →William Nierenberg and WP:3RR
10:3010:30, 20 September 2008 diff hist +400 User talk:Macgruder →William Nierenberg and WP:3RR
10:2910:29, 20 September 2008 diff hist 0 User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen →4th 'revert' is not a revert
10:2910:29, 20 September 2008 diff hist +434 User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen →4th 'revert' is not a revert: new section
08:5108:51, 20 September 2008 diff hist +8 Talk:William Nierenberg →Jolly edit wars
05:5105:51, 20 September 2008 diff hist +750 User talk:Macgruder →William Nierenberg and WP:3RR
05:3805:38, 20 September 2008 diff hist +100 Talk:William Nierenberg →Jolly edit wars
05:3405:34, 20 September 2008 diff hist +1,880 Talk:William Nierenberg →Jolly edit wars
05:1905:19, 20 September 2008 diff hist +1,275 User talk:William M. Connolley →William Nierenberg
04:5904:59, 20 September 2008 diff hist +8 William Nierenberg Readdition of mistaken removal of October

19:4219:42, 19 September 2008 diff hist +129 Talk:Liancourt Rocks →Comments
19:3419:34, 19 September 2008 diff hist −421 Talk:Liancourt Rocks →Comments
19:2119:21, 19 September 2008 diff hist +629 Talk:Liancourt Rocks →Comments
18:2018:20, 19 September 2008 diff hist +165 User talk:William M. Connolley →William Nierenberg
13:1913:19, 19 September 2008 diff hist −3 William Nierenberg 'Passivy' (perhaps temporarily) who made the request for the report to remove most contentious issue
13:1313:13, 19 September 2008 diff hist +4 User talk:William M. Connolley →William Nierenberg
13:0913:09, 19 September 2008 diff hist +158 User talk:William M. Connolley →William Nierenberg
12:5812:58, 19 September 2008 diff hist +1,086 User talk:William M. Connolley →William Nierenberg
12:4912:49, 19 September 2008 diff hist +269 William Nierenberg rv - Do you have a clue about Wikipedia policy? [WP:VERIFY]. If you cannot verify your claim then it doesn't belong . My edit has reliable source, yours doesn't. Find the source then make the edit.
09:5409:54, 19 September 2008 diff hist +269 William Nierenberg Sorry the 1983 was a mistake. So use the respected source: "So Reagan commissioned a third report about global warming from Bill Nierenberg". A blog is not a respected source, not allowed by Wikipedia
07:3707:37, 19 September 2008 diff hist +297 William Nierenberg No edit summary
07:3007:30, 19 September 2008 diff hist −3 m William Nierenberg No edit summary
07:3007:30, 19 September 2008 diff hist +385 William Nierenberg The link you provide says the commission was in place, but its formal charge wasn't established till next year. I've clarified that, added the summary using a respected source rather than a blog.
06:0606:06, 19 September 2008 diff hist +81 Talk:Chiropractic →Confusing sentence
06:0406:04, 19 September 2008 diff hist +1,894 Talk:Chiropractic →Confusing sentence

17:5117:51, 18 September 2008 diff hist +2,261 m Talk:Chiropractic →References
17:5017:50, 18 September 2008 diff hist −2,261 Talk:Chiropractic →Confusing sentence
17:5017:50, 18 September 2008 diff hist +2,261 Talk:Chiropractic →Confusing sentence: new section
14:3614:36, 18 September 2008 diff hist +129 Talk:Chiropractic →Outside view by WhatamIdoing
14:2814:28, 18 September 2008 diff hist +506 Talk:Chiropractic →View by Ludwigs2

22 September 2008

21 September 2008

20 September 2008

19 September 2008

18 September 2008