User contributions for ProEdits

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

13:1613:16, 21 December 2009 diff hist +1,408 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin R. D. Shepherd →Reply from Smartse

22:0822:08, 19 December 2009 diff hist +488 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin R. D. Shepherd →Kevin R. D. Shepherd: Comment on reference to materials by indefinitely banned former user SSS108

06:2706:27, 13 October 2009 diff hist −621 Sathya Sai Baba →Responses to criticism: This entry refers to a totally unreliable article as shown to the full already.

11:5111:51, 28 September 2009 diff hist +9 User talk:ProEdits →Arbitration Enforcement Case: small text clarification
11:4911:49, 28 September 2009 diff hist +1,512 User talk:ProEdits →Arbitration Enforcement Case: reasons for impossibility of assuming good faith on part of implacable pro-Sai cult editor

09:0109:01, 22 September 2009 diff hist +1,293 Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard →User:ProEdits: reply to Radiantenergy's fanatically-pursued agenda aginst ProEdits

19:3719:37, 16 September 2009 diff hist +1,408 User talk:Mfield →I seek Admin help: Comment on allegation by Radiantenergy of my needing to be stopped for having mistakenly vandalised
18:5018:50, 16 September 2009 diff hist +391 Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard →User:ProEdits: brief replt to Atami's good explanations
18:3618:36, 16 September 2009 diff hist +1,570 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Repeated Vandalism by ProEdits aka Activist Robert Priddy: Reply to what I regard as edit-war tactics by user Radiantenergy
18:2018:20, 16 September 2009 diff hist −47 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Non-reputable source references for deletion: removal of my illicit link in accordance with information on the COI discussion page. Sorry this comes a bit late
14:0714:07, 16 September 2009 diff hist +2,146 Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard →User:ProEdits: Questions and comments on alleged COI on my behalf and related issues
13:3413:34, 16 September 2009 diff hist +1,651 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Non-reputable source references for deletion: further information underpinning removal of reference to the Asian Voice article
13:3013:30, 16 September 2009 diff hist −1,400 Sathya Sai Baba →Responses to criticism: Removal of this insert is necessary since the article is highly tendentions, largely unresearched and unreliable as already shown. See talk 'Non-reputa Source..'
13:2413:24, 16 September 2009 diff hist −1,116 Sathya Sai Baba →Responses to criticism: Article removed for very weighty reasons already stated on talk page. See also further under 'Criticism'
13:1513:15, 16 September 2009 diff hist +1,680 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Criticism: Accusation of vandalism - latest attack on me by Radiantenergy - is not merited. He refuses to address the real issues - unreliable article in Daily Pioneer epaper
12:4012:40, 16 September 2009 diff hist −1,297 Sathya Sai Baba →Criticism and controversy: I am removeing this again as it is not vandalism, as Radiantenergy claims in edit-warring - I have given full objective grounds for the unreliability of this article
10:0310:03, 16 September 2009 diff hist −1,399 Sathya Sai Baba →Responses to criticism: Article not sourced properly. Asian Voice is a minor local newspaper of reent origin, not a reliable source according to Wiki policy
10:0110:01, 16 September 2009 diff hist −1,099 Sathya Sai Baba →Responses to criticism: further reasons why the Daily Pioneer article falsely quoting me is not a reliable source - refer to talk page for details
09:5909:59, 16 September 2009 diff hist −1,296 Sathya Sai Baba →Criticism and controversy: further reasons why the Daily Pioneer article falsely quoting me is not a reliable source
09:5709:57, 16 September 2009 diff hist +2,221 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Non-reputable source references for deletion: response to Sbs108 and further reasons why the Daily Pioneer article falsely quoting me is not a reliable source

16:3516:35, 15 September 2009 diff hist −1,560 User:Andries/sandbox01 →Sathya Sai Organisation officials and followers response: Removal of reference to non-sorced article. It is unavailable even where SSS108 posted it at http://www.geocities.com/wikirefs/asian-voi
14:2314:23, 15 September 2009 diff hist +60 Sathya Sai Baba →Criticism and controversy: Reverted and shortened para. on the TV documentaries about Sai Baba and the very serious allegation made, which still stand legally unchallened.
13:4913:49, 15 September 2009 diff hist −1,299 Sathya Sai Baba →Criticism and controversy: Removal of ref. to article which contains proven untruth about Robert Priddy (i.e. Proedits), See talk page
13:4713:47, 15 September 2009 diff hist +1,278 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Non-reputable source references for deletion: Removal of an article in the Daily Pioneer which contains a lie about me and article is thus an unreliable source.
10:4610:46, 15 September 2009 diff hist +1,368 Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard →User:ProEdits: reply as requested by J929
08:3508:35, 15 September 2009 diff hist 0 m Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard →User:ProEdits: typos
08:3408:34, 15 September 2009 diff hist −2 m Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard →User:ProEdits: typo corrected
08:2708:27, 15 September 2009 diff hist +397 Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard →User:ProEdits
08:0508:05, 15 September 2009 diff hist +1,141 Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard →User:ProEdits: Justifiable reply defending myself against J929's attacks
07:4407:44, 15 September 2009 diff hist −1 m Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard →User:ProEdits
07:3307:33, 15 September 2009 diff hist +942 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Non-reputable source references for deletion: Daily Pioneer untrue statement.
07:2907:29, 15 September 2009 diff hist −1,305 Sathya Sai Baba →Criticism and controversy: The Daily Pioneer web article contains both provable false defamatory statements about Robert Priddy. So it is an unreliable source - see talk page
07:2107:21, 15 September 2009 diff hist −284 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Article uses mostly not reliable sources: This is overwhelmingly an attack site on ex-followers of Sathya Sai Baba who are dissidents. It is clearly used here as a platform for persona views

17:3817:38, 8 September 2009 diff hist +1,937 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Toning down the strong criticism based on unproved allegations and fixing BLP issues: Response to POV and agenda pushing accusation
17:2517:25, 8 September 2009 diff hist +289 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Toning down the strong criticism based on unproved allegations and fixing BLP issues: Explanation to J929 for reverting the BBC paragraph and improving it
17:1617:16, 8 September 2009 diff hist +1,094 Sathya Sai Baba J929's revert to a flawed text, watered down the issue to obscure its seriousness is removed. Former version reinstated with text improved, key source links, removal of gobbledygook. See talk page

21:1621:16, 7 September 2009 diff hist +1,299 Sathya Sai Baba →Responses to criticism: Replaced this response to criticism in the correct place under 'Responses to Criticism', where it obviously needs to be.
21:1221:12, 7 September 2009 diff hist −1,488 m Sathya Sai Baba →Criticism and controversy: Removed entry which had not ref name corrections included.
21:0921:09, 7 September 2009 diff hist −652 m Sathya Sai Baba →Criticism and controversy: reinstated revision removed by error in trying to enter another revision.
21:0221:02, 7 September 2009 diff hist +1 Sathya Sai Baba Undid revision 312459605 by ProEdits (talk)
20:5220:52, 7 September 2009 diff hist −1 m Sathya Sai Baba →Criticism and controversy: Reinstated largely erased para. on BBC allegations, yet toning down somewhat and shortening to remove repetition. See discussion page under Toning down ... 'etc.
20:3020:30, 7 September 2009 diff hist +1,515 Sathya Sai Baba →Criticism and controversy: Reinstated largely erased para. on BBC allegations, yet toning down somewhat and shortening to remove repetition. See discussion page under Toning down ... 'etc.
20:1420:14, 7 September 2009 diff hist +4,917 Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Toning down the strong criticism based on unproved allegations and fixing BLP issues: Added challenging reasons for reinstating BBC materials
18:1918:19, 7 September 2009 diff hist +915 Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard →User:ProEdits: This is a reply to an accusation which dioes not hold any water
17:0117:01, 7 September 2009 diff hist −86 Sathya Sai Baba →Beliefs and practices of devotees: Removed link to sathyasaibaba.wordpress.com which is a pro-Sai site full of massive attacks on critics by banned SSS108
16:5716:57, 7 September 2009 diff hist −125 Sathya Sai Baba * Beliefs and practices of devotees */ Removal of brief text and link because this link is a link to a site owned by the banned editor SSS108 and is inadmissable

10:4310:43, 3 September 2009 diff hist 0 m Talk:Sathya Sai Baba →Non-reputable source references for deletion
10:4010:40, 3 September 2009 diff hist +1,305 Sathya Sai Baba →Responses to criticism: Insertion of paragraph which I removed from the Controversy section since it actually is a 'Rebuttal of Criticism'
10:3810:38, 3 September 2009 diff hist −1,305 Sathya Sai Baba →Criticism and controversy: Removal of paragraph to the appropriate section 'Rebuttal of criticism'
10:3510:35, 3 September 2009 diff hist −809 Sathya Sai Baba →Criticism and controversy: Removal of paragraph because it is covered already in new addition above here

21 December 2009

19 December 2009

13 October 2009

28 September 2009

22 September 2009

16 September 2009

15 September 2009

8 September 2009

7 September 2009

3 September 2009