Talk:.design

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the .design article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Another Believer (talk · contribs) has been paid by Top Level Design.

Sources

---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COI

In accordance with Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, I have chosen to disclose that I have a personal connection to this subject. But, my main purpose in writing this article is to benefit Wikipedia and its mission. I believe this article is written from a neutral perspective, is sourced appropriately, and has been constructed from independent, reliable sources. The second link above provides the following summary, which I believe I have followed appropriately:

Be transparent about your conflict of interest ( Done)
Subjects require significant coverage in independent reliable sources. ( Done)
Your role is to inform and reference, not promote or sell. ( Done)
Be extremely cautious about the risks of editing articles about yourself or your clients ( Done)
If writing a draft, write without bias, as if you don't work for the company or personally know the subject. ( Done)
State facts and statistics, don't be vague or general. ( Done)
Take time to get sources and policy right. ( Done)
Get neutral, uninvolved, disinterested editors to review your draft. ( Doing...)
Work with the community and we'll work with you. ( Doing...)
Communicate, communicate, communicate. ( Doing...)

My ultimate goal is to promote this article to Good or Featured status. I understand this will require review and assistance from other members of the community, which is great. I invite all to examine this article carefully to make sure the content is fair and accurate. I have experience promoting COI articles to Good or Featured status, including this one, this one, this one and this one. Feel free to contact me if you have any concerns. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:03, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag (January 2023)

Creator and editor has COI to Ray King and created their bio, company page, and this page and others connected to the company. KeepItGoingForward (talk) 07:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yup! Editors are welcome to identify non-neutral or otherwise problematic text. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 13:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HapHaxion: Thanks for updating the template above and please let me know if you identify any problematic content or wish to help with removing the tag. Thanks again and happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@KeepItGoingForward: Since you're happy with the Talk page templates now, can you remove the "close connection" tag? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:03, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removing the tag, Equine-man. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:16, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Equine-man, User:KeepItGoingForward, I'm also seeking removal of the COI tags at .design, .gay, and .wiki, if you're able to help. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update tag

@HapHaxion: I see you've added an 'update' tag to this article. Here are some sources re: GoDaddy:

Do you have any interest in resolving the tag by adding a quick update to the article? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:05, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]