Jump to content

Talk:2010 Samsung Mobile 500

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article2010 Samsung Mobile 500 was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 3, 2010Good article nomineeListed
June 15, 2010Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:2010 Samsung Mobile 500/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 18:41, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have reviewed this article, copy edited it and added some wikilinks. Please feel free to edit any mistakes I may have made. This is a short article, but it clearly tells the story of the race and complies with the GA criteria.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality: Concise writing
    B. MoS compliance: Complies with the basic MoS
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources: Sources are reliable
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced where needed
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects: Broad in scope
    B. Focused: } Remains focused on topic
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Pass!

Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 18:41, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted GA

[edit]

As the assessment was done by a socking and essentially banned user, major issues such as prose were not adressed. There should be some element of a progression of the race, but a lap by lap recount is not proper prose. I would suggest a reassessment of this and any other articles the user reviewed once the issues are addressed.--Terrillja talk 04:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]