Talk:B movies (Hollywood Golden Age)

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the B movies (Hollywood Golden Age) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

B movies (Hollywood Golden Age) was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 20, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed

Film: Filmmaking / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

Fair use rationale for Image:LadiesCravePoster.jpg

Image:LadiesCravePoster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing info updated per research.—DCGeist 08:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"B-Westerns" are not "cowboy programmers"

It irks me that "Saturday matinee cowboy features" (epitomized by the works of William "Hopalong Cassidy" Boyd, Gene Autry and Roy Rogers) are so often called "B-Westerns," because they are simply not the same thing, and certainly Wikipedia should not perpetuate this false belief. In the 1930s, while John Wayne was cranking out many of the former for Lone Star Productions (supposedly a pseudonym for Monogram Pictures, but this does not appear to be the case--that's another debate, however) and then Republic, Randolph Scott was starring in the latter for Paramount, a series of adaptations of Zane Grey stories (The Thundering Herd, for one). The absolute proof of the distinction involves Universal Studios: When new management took over in 1947 and rechristened the place Universal-International, they shut down the programmer division. No more serials or "cowboy" features, but nobody would claim that the Francis the Talking Mule or Ma and Pa Kettle pictures they produced in the 1950s were anything but "Bs." These are (or were, since both no longer exist) absolutely two different production levels and, I submit, Wiki should be making an effort to set the record straight. Ted Watson (talk) 20:14, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA on hold

Hello. I will be doing the Good Article review for this article. Here are some things that need to be fixed before I can pass the article:

Per WP:LEAD, the lead needs to be three or four full paragraphs fully describing all the main points of the article.
The captions for the images are far too long. Wikipedia:Captions has some good guidelines for writing appropriate captions.
The first paragraph under Rise of the double feature: 1930s needs citations.
There is some jargon in the article that should be explained. Ex. Blind bidding, block booking, etc. It's good to blue link them to definitions, but a quick definition in the text is more helpful to readers.
The quote "straddle[d] the A-B boundary," needs a ref.
The three columned list in Rise of the double feature: 1930s, looks odd to me. Is there a better way to format that? Maybe a table or a different type of list?
Taves estimates that half of the films produced by the eight majors in the 1930s were B movies. - needs the ref for where exactly he said that.
The block quote in Cowboys and dogs needs to be formatted with <blockquote></blockquote>.
Avoid contractions. Wasn't --> Was not.
In most cases, numbers under 100 should be spelled out.

The hold will last one week. Good luck improving the article. Nikki311 02:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The hold still has a couple of more hours, but I am going to fail this article as no progress has been made. Nikki311 01:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taves's name

Someone may say

Gosh, if his name really is "Brain", a lot of people would change it to "Brian" without checking.

True enuf. But surely his publisher got it right on the cover of his book, whose facsimile is low-res but utterly inconsistent with "Brain".
--Jerzy•t 19:36, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Programmers"

That is an interesting concept as it is described in the article.
But, unless I have overlooked something, no examples are given.
What are some famous programmers with "intermediate" budgets?
Varlaam (talk) 18:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]