Talk:Belarus in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2015

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Belarus in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2015 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Belarus Low‑importance

	Belarus portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Eurovision Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge with Volshebstvo

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was Merge. Figure81 (talk) 09:51, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article fails WP:NSONGS. After what was discussed and the change to WP:NMG, it is better the article be merged in the proposed location. Wes Mouse ✒ 16:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: I agree. If no one opposes the merge in a little while and you haven't merged it then I'll go ahead and merge it. Figure81 (talk) 13:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine with me Figure81, if you wish to carry out the action as a speedy merge. Wes Mouse ✒ 10:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cleanup

I came by this article for the merge but found that multiple past merges have caused the article to need some rearranging. I've removed a ton of redundancy but there is still more to be removed. I am not sure if anyone else is watching the article other than me and Wesley, but hopefully I've made a good start. I might be back to do some more later, just ran out of time this morning is all. Figure81 (talk) 10:36, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]