Jump to content

Talk:Conspiracy against rights

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Conspiracy against rights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:52, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism section

[edit]

IdanST, you used not one, not two, but three unreliable sources trying to support your point. Got anything more reliable? CBS News is generally reliable but really shouldn't be alone. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 13:46, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've used 6 different sources although I could have used only 1.
You could remove the 3 "unreliable sources", but not delete the entire section only because 3 out of 6 are unreliable, because it's admitting that I've used atleast 3 reliable sources. Here. IdanST (talk) 13:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey LilianaUwU,
Can you please mention what are the unreliable sources I've used? IdanST (talk) 14:13, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fox News, the Daily Mail and the New York Post are all listed as unreliable on WP:RSP. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 14:41, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply.
I'll revert your revert and remove these sources.
3 sources is more than enough. IdanST (talk) 15:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done IdanST (talk) 15:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]