Jump to content

Talk:Eels (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Untitled

[edit]

Why should the title be "eels" (with a lower case 'e') and not "Eels"?

Yeah, why? I'm changing it back. (p.s. please sign your edits.) --Gika 07:51, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
"Eels" was spelled "eels" for the first two albums and thus many fans refer to them as such. On a related note, E was never known as "Mr. E" during his solo career nor has he ever been officially called this, so putting this informal nickname on par with his official moniker "E" would be confusing. It would be like calling Madonna "Ms. Madonna" or Dido "Ms. Dido." Yes, on stage he is often ironically introduced as "Mr. E" and there's a song with that in the title, but "E" is his official moniker for both his solo career and for Eels. Calbaer 18:07, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blues?

[edit]

Despite the album title, there's no discernable blues on any of the Eels albums that I've heard. There's a specific harmonic progression central to pretty much all blues -- a I / V / IV pattern -- and other typical features that aren't featured in the Eels' music. I'd like to remove that from the genre box. Scott.wheeler 16:46, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm updating this since there have been no objections. Scott.wheeler 11:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've always thought that the blues in his album titles and songs meant: 'blues' as in 'feeling down' or 'upset' although i do see your point and hey, you could well be right. I know i'm sometimes wrong :o)

Kingkieran 15.48 05/07/07


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED TO Eels (band), per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 23:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]

EELS (band) → Eels – Really a move back to where it used to be. No reason for page having been moved. Why? Why would one choose this capitalization? This was totally arbitrary, no consensus, discussion, or conventions cited. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 20:15, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Discussion

[edit]

Add any additional comments.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Koavf (talk • contribs) at 20:15, September 8, 2006

Ahem. Let me just say, first off, these "RM" efforts would be better spent on a request for the domain "Eels (band)". Now, since you've made this a case of "EELS (band)" over "Eels", I'll explain. The title "Eels" could easily refer to the species and several other uses. Analogy: Heroes redirects to Hero (disambiguation) as the title could be simply the plural for Hero or refer to, say, the new TV show. I've been disambiguating for hours and let me tell you, "eels" could refer to a lot of stuff, as could the all capitalized version. Thus, I cause the only remaining domain rather than doing the whole RM thing. (no offense.) Now, if you'll forgive me, the following might seem a bit rude.

It was messed up enough that this article—whose title should, without question, end with "(band)". (OVERCAPPED or lowercase)—had the domain "Eels". You people actually defending- no...insisting on it? WTF? Bottomline: plurals should, in general, redirect to the main article's title. Considering that, a link to the disambiguation page is pretty generous. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 02:54, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But the disambiguation page lists only ONE disambiguation for the plural eel, which is the band. How can you say it refers to a lot of stuff? And anyway, wasn't the "for other uses, see..." on the top of the page enough? Gika 07:59, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I won't debate how many uses there are. At best, it still comes down to "Eel" and this article. Eel obviously came first and "eels" has been the accepted plural. Just because an encyclopedia article could replace a redirect doesn't mean it should. And no, the dab stuff on top is not okay. It should be avoided. The majority of people who link to or type in "eels" aren't looking for Mr. E and his band, okay? At best, a new disambiguation page would have to be made out of the "eels" domain and that's pointlessly redundant. The simple fact is, sometimes the "good" titles are tied up with other purposes. I disambiguated Deadpool (comics) from Deadpool a few days ago because the term "dead pool"—with or eithout spaces—predates the fictional character.
Now, he's my advice: change te requsted title to "Eels (band)". It just isn't logical for this article to have such an ambiguous title. And hey, if it makes you feel any better, it took a lot of practice—transliteration: mistakes—to understand, respect and generally get good at this who disambiguation thing. I was like you guys. I held up the disambiguation of Thor (comics) to Thor (Marvel Comics). I'm also sorry for not explaining my actions more clearly and leaving the article with an undesired title. Good luck with your move request. I hope you'll come around soon. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 09:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Fair use rationale for Image:Eels - Daisies Of The Galaxy.jpg

[edit]

Image:Eels - Daisies Of The Galaxy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:51, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I have removed a few external links from the page. Most were no longer active and one, Behind the Church, violated copyright in reproducing lyrics without permission (see WP:COPY and WP:EL for the policies that I have applied here.) Thanks. -- Alucard (Dr.) | Talk 22:52, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Rock Hard Times has been given permission to host audience recordings and other content in a review/news capacity. It is permissable as an external link. - rockoclock

Shrek Soundtrack

[edit]

Why is talk about the inclusion of 2 songs in Shrek 3 given space above the contents? This should surely be moved down? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.84.129 (talk) 21:14, August 28, 2007 (UTC)

Dubya Hates Daisies

[edit]

For anyone with a mind to I've a small piece of news from Eels official website on the Daisies of the Galaxy cover 'scandal'. It's about halfway down, listed under 10/30/2000. http://www.eelstheband.com/news/index00.php —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.202.237.191 (talk) 03:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I linked some better sources from the article, and fixed the article, which said that Bush was president in 2000 and wanted to have the album banned, two obviously laughable things. Bush likely was never aware of the album, but his staff issued a press release (and had spokesmen Ari Fleischer and Dan Bartlett talk) about how an album with profanity and cartoon imagery was given away at a Democratic get-together. (Actually, I doubt both talked about this; it's likely one did and was mistaken for the other. If anyone has any info about this, please share.) The point was not to ban the album, but that Democrats were supposedly beholden to the entertainment industry. The Bush campaign likely thought this was a Joe Camel approach to entertainment that should be enjoyed by adults. The link you gave is useful, however, since the Post article is no longer online at the Post's site. Calbaer (talk) 19:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hellboy 2

[edit]

Beautiful Freak was in Hellboy 2. Can someone add that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Videogamer765 (talk • contribs) 22:11, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I have to go to work but ditto that. Beautiful Freak was featured pretty prominently in Hellboy 2 Deatonjr (talk) 11:49, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs help

[edit]

This article badly needs a rewrite, or at least a reworking. Too much of the material is utter fancruft, and a lot of it has either nothing to do with the band's notability, or is entirely unimportant. I mean, an entire section on a dog? I went ahead and removed that section, as well as trimmed down the fan section to remove some of the hyperbolic statements and unrelated portions. I mean, a karaoke contest? Hardly notable or important. On a less extreme note, I recommend that the "history" section simply be repurposed into a "history" section that includes the formation of the band, as well as more information on their activity before, in-between and after albums. (of course, only NOTABLE information.) There's definitely a ton of potential for this article, but it seriously needs some help. Also, I think that the template needs to be re-worked. I understand that there have been several members of the band, but I hardly think that 53. Remember, just because they contributed to an album does NOT mean that they were part of the band. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 06:47, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it needs to be reworked. I am a fan of the band, and I hadn't heard of half of the stuff mentioned in the article on any other site, which seems to lend credence to the non-notability of much of the article. It's hard to know what is notable for this band besides their albums, however, (I think, at least) simply because of the fact that they don't sell a ton of albums and aren't well known. 69.161.78.31 (talk) 18:55, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Someone also needs to clarify the reason for the title of Hombre Lobo. The album received its title b/c it is a concept album of sorts. The entire album is written from the perspective of a love sick werewolf that can't have the (human) girl of his dreams. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.1.253.26 (talk) 18:55, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The dog (Bobby Jr.) is really an important part of E's life, he features in most of E's video's and has even a section on the official Eels website. [1] So although it may look strange, he should be mentioned somewhere. Acriel (talk) 13:38, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bad dude in love

[edit]

Bad dude in love is the first solo album of E. If 'A man called E' and 'Broken Toy Shop' is mentioned under E solo records, there should be a reference of this one too. On the Eels' discography there is already a reference of it. Acriel (talk) 13:38, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On second thoughts, I should admit that E is rather ashamed of this LP. It was released in 1985, when he was 22. The official Eels website doesn't even mention it, but on the other hand there is already a wiki-page devoted to it [2] Acriel (talk) 13:51, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eels (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eels (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Electro Shock Blues

[edit]

should read 'died by suicide' in place of 'committed suicide' 82.41.4.147 (talk) 22:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Eels_(band)&oldid=1257717773"