Jump to content

Talk:Euro

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleEuro is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleEuro has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 19, 2004Refreshing brilliant proseKept
February 23, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
March 26, 2006Good article nomineeListed
June 15, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 24, 2011Good article nomineeListed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 1, 2007, December 31, 2010, December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2016.
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

Negatives

[edit]

I see no mention of the arguments against the Euro, and little mention of the countries that have rejected it. Something that I think the article sorely needs for balance. 128.151.71.7 (talk) 15:20, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So go ahead and find a consensus of critical appraisals, written from a WP:Neutral point of view by wp:reliable sources, please. Then propose a draft here. You may find some starting points at optimum currency area. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 17:35, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Pros and Cons of the Euro has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 13 § Pros and Cons of the Euro until a consensus is reached. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 19:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:08, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Organizing the article

[edit]

After the recent changes by Dasomm, the article has two very similar sections: Countries that use Euro and Direct and indirect usage. This isn't good for the article, especially considering that the section titled Countries that use Euro talks also about countries that don't use the euro. Any suggestions to fixing this? Merging the two sections? Vgbyp (talk) 14:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I edit the article once again, I think now it looks better. Dasomm (talk) 11:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's much better! Thank you! Vgbyp (talk) 09:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]