Talk:HMAS Parramatta (D55)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMAS Parramatta (D55) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / South Pacific / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	World War I task force

Australia: Military history / Maritime Low‑importance

	Australia portal HMAS Parramatta (D55) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian maritime history (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Parramatta First Ship Commissioned into RAN?

Article states that Parramatta is the first ship commissioned into the RAN. I struggle to see how this can be true as the RAN was given it's title "RAN" in July 1911 and Parramatta was commissioned in 1910. Additionally if we are merely referring to ships in the service of the commonwealth then this is certainly not true as Cerberus and Pioneer to mention just two of the former colonial forces ships were operated by the Commonwealth since the formation of the Commonwealth Naval Forces on 1 March 1901. I think this statement is simply based on Parramatta's Motto "first born of the commonwealth", which it would appear is based on the fact that Parramatta was the first ship built for the commonwealth, and not acquired from the former colonies upon Federation. Any other views? AlexanderFrancis (talk) 07:20, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Such an assertion (if true) needs a citation, and so I've tagged it with {{fact}}. My advice - if you can't find a reference, then delete the line. Perhaps it was the first modern warship commissioned into the RAN, but I'm no expert on this period and navy. Shem (talk) 10:07, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully, my edits have been able to clarify. Parramatta was one of the first three new ships ordered for the Commonwealth Naval Forces, and the first of these to be launched. Some incorrect conflation of facts (launched = commissioned, CNF = Australian navy = Royal Australian Navy) could have resulted in the old statement. -- saberwyn 03:11, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that works much better, and it is referenced clearly. A further question though, do we know when she was given the Prefix "HMAS" was that as soon as she was commissioned into the CNF or was it after the King granted the "Royal" to the Australian navy?AlexanderFrancis (talk) 03:50, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As cited in "Early Career", she was recommissioned with the prefix in March 1911, even though the prefix didn't become official until July (at the same time "Royal Australian Navy" was approved). -- saberwyn 05:20, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]