Talk:History of American journalism

Journalism Mid‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: History Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Low-importance).

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

No headlines?

The words "headline" and "headlines" do not occur in this article, nor is the concept really discussed. IMHO a section on this topic would be nice. Ttocserp 09:41, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

good point. I added info based on George Everett, "Printing Technology as a Barrier to Multi-Column Headlines, 1850–95." Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 53.3 (1976): 528-532. Rjensen (talk) 11:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't Everett's thesis [1] kinda suggest the opposite of his title?

Still, thanks for starting writing on this topic. I wanted to link an article to the topic but could find it nowhere in Wikipedia. Ttocserp 12:32, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of American journalism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

social media

I removed the sentence: "New social media technologies such as Twitter have proved to be a major source and venue for American journalism in the early 21st century." It looks accurate but isnt really -- while journalists use Twitter and sometimes report on things that happen on Twitter, Twitter is not exactly a publishing press. I think the sentence is trying to talk about the news stories about what this or that person said on Twitter, and also about using social media to promote breaking news stories. I basically agree with that but cannot at this moment think of a better way to word the sentence. Which I still think we really need. There should also be some mention of the democratization of news that it allows, along with a lot of other activity that isn't specifically journalism, like flirting, touching emotional bases with friends, and silly selfies. Elinruby (talk) 09:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC) an[reply]